-
- J Lexchin.
- Emergency Department, Toronto Hospital, Ont.
- CMAJ. 1993 Jan 1; 148 (1): 35-8.
ObjectiveTo analyse the potential effect of generic drug competition on prices in Ontario to assess the costs and benefits associated with Bill C-22 (An Act to amend the Patent Act).DesignComparison of the cost of the least and most expensive versions of all products sold by more than one manufacturer in 1991. The number of brand-name and generic drug companies marketing each of the products was recorded.ResultsOf 1599 products 437 (27.3%) were made by more than one company. Almost half (44.6%) of the 437 were sold by two companies. The more companies that sold a drug the greater the difference in price between the least and most expensive versions. Similarly, as the proportion of generic drug companies in competition increased, the greater the price difference. When competition was between generic drug companies only, the price spread was smaller than when it was between brand-name drug companies only.ConclusionsGeneric drug competition can result in savings to the Ontario Drug Benefit Plan. A more in-depth analysis of the potential savings is necessary to fully assess the costs and benefits associated with Bill C-22.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.