• Adam L Green, Joanna Yi, Natalie Bezler, Yana Pikman, Venée N Tubman, Esther A Obeng, Teresa O'Neil, Robert Mersereau, Lisa Morrissey, and Amy L Billett.
• Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
• Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Jan 1; 63 (1): 112-7.

BackgroundFever and neutropenia (F&N) is a pediatric oncology emergency due to the risk of disseminated infection. Quality improvement (QI) efforts to improve time to antibiotics for F&N in the emergency department have been documented, but the issue has not been studied in the established inpatient setting.ProcedureWe undertook a prospective cohort QI study to decrease time to antibiotics for neutropenic pediatric oncology inpatients with new fever to <60 min. Our key intervention was discussion of a plan in case of new fever, including antibiotic(s) to be started, for each patient on rounds. Timing for each step in the process, from fever identification to antibiotic administration, was measured through the electronic medical record for each fever event.ResultsThe median time to antibiotics during the 3-three month intervention study period was 76.0 min, although the distribution was skewed due to several long outliers (mean 142.5, interquartile range 51-206, range 47-593 min). Time to antibiotics was significantly shorter when a fever contingency plan was documented in the most recent note than not (mean 102 vs. 254 min, P = 0.039). Over the total 2.75 year data-collection period, the quarterly percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 min has improved from 35 to 65, whereas quarterly mean time to antibiotics has improved from 99 to 50 min.ConclusionsDaily discussion of a fever contingency plan appears effective in decreasing the time to antibiotics for neutropenic pediatric oncology inpatients with new fever, likely by circumventing the need for multi-level discussion of the antibiotic plan when fever is identified.© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

22 keywords...

hide…