• J Med Assoc Thai · Apr 2013

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of maternal factors and neonatal outcomes between elective cesarean section and spontaneous vaginal delivery.

    • Chuenrutai Yeekian, Somsak Jesadapornchai, Kongsak Urairong, Somruk Santibenjakul, Wanphen Suksong, and Chaivej Nuchprayoon.
    • Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Chonburi, Thailand. jayeekian88@live.com
    • J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Apr 1; 96 (4): 389-94.

    BackgroundThe rising rate of cesarean section has been of concern worldwide. Maternalfactors and neonatal outcomes of cesarean section and vaginal delivery remain unclearObjectiveTo compare the diferences of maternal factors and neonatal outcomes between mothers who underwent Elective Cesarean Section (ECS) and spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sectional descriptive research studied all delivery data of Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital between June 1, 2010 and May 31, 2011. Two thousand eight hundred seventy six deliveries were included. From these, 648 mothers delivered by ECS while 2,228 mothers delivered by SVD. The data quality was tested via the agreement between the 115 sampling delivery records and the same delivery of the extracted data. The percent agreement was 99% (minimum 97-maximum 100). Pearson's Chi-square test and an independent t-test were used to compare the distribution or mean of two groups as appropriate. The statistically significant diference was defined as p-value less than 0.05.ResultsThe statistically significant diferences of maternal factors, and neonatal outcomes between mothers who underwent ECS and SVD were found as follows. The ECS mother showed the mean age (28.7 (3.5) vs. 27.1 (3.8) years, p< O. 001), the mean (SD) of number of antenatal care (9.9 (2.8) vs. 7.0 (3.3) times, p< 0.001) and the mean (SD) of hematocrit (36.8 (3.3)% vs. 35.8 (3.5)%, p = 0.001) greater than SVD mother The neonates of ECS mother had weight greater than SVD (3,194.5 vs. 3,078.3 grams, p = 0.001), and showed the percentage of presence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) higher than the neonate of SVD mother (5.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.010). The neonates of SVD mother had mean Apgar scores at first minute (8.0 vs. 7.9 scores, p = 0.015) and at fifth minute (9.8 vs. 9.5 scores, p = 0.001) greater than the neonates of ECS mother They demonstrated the percentages of presence of meconium stain in amniotic fluid (MSAF) and presence of cord accident higher than neonate of CS mother (5.3% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.002, and 16.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.001, respectively).ConclusionThe neonates of ECS mother had a greater weight and a higher risk for pulmonary problems. The neonates of SVD mother have a higher risk for MSAF cord accident, and meconium aspiration. It reflected the need for prolong process of labor and delivery prevention.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.