• H Ito, Y Watanabe, A Isshiki, and H Uchino.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, Japan.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Feb 1; 43 (2): 153-62.

BackgroundThe mechanism of the neuroprotective effects of propofol was compared to two other types of intravenous (i.v.) anesthetics (i.e., benzodiazepine; midazolam and barbiturate; pentobarbital) using Mongolian gerbils focusing on GABA receptor subtypes.MethodsNeuronal injury was induced by a 4-min occlusion of the common carotid arteries followed by reperfusion. One week after occlusion, animals were transcardially perfused for histochemistry. Neuronal death in four brain regions was evaluated by direct visual counting of acidophilic neurons.ResultsSeven days after this ischemic episode, severe neuronal injury was measured in the hippocampal CA1 area (> 98% of total cells damaged) and parietal cortex (> 35%). Also lateral thalamus and caudate putamen were damaged but to a lesser extent (about 10%). The neuronal injury in these areas was significantly attenuated by propofol, midazolam and the GABAA agonist, muscimol, intraperitoneally administered 15 min prior to ischemia. This neuroprotective property, however, was lacking with pentobarbital and GABAB agonist baclofen. Concomitant pretreatment with subthreshold doses of propofol and muscimol significantly reduced the amount of cell death induced by brain ischemia. On the other hand, pretreatment with the GABAA antagonist bicuculline significantly inhibited the neuroprotective effects of propofol. However, a GABAB antagonist, phaclofen, was without effect on neuronal damage and on neuronal protection of propofol.ConclusionThese results indicate that activation of GABAA receptors, which include the specific binding subunits for propofol and midazolam, but not pentobarbital, plays a role in the inhibition of neuronal death induced by brain ischemia.

39 keywords...

hide…