-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization.
- Saipriya Tewari, Poonam Bhadoria, Sonia Wadhawan, Sudha Prasad, and Amit Kohli.
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226014, India. Electronic address: saitewari.mamc@gmail.com.
- J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov 1; 34: 105-12.
Study ObjectiveDay care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl in Indian patients, is a procedure of special interest because, in addition to the above concerns, toxic effects of propofol on oocytes have been described. We have studied the role of entropy monitor, a depth of anesthesia monitor, in optomising drug titration and facilitating distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of anesthesia.DesignProspective randomized controlled study.SettingOperating theater and postoperative recovery area.PatientsOne hundred twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II female patients coming to the IVF centre for TVOR under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group EM (drugs titrated as per entropy values: state entropy and response entropy) and group CM (drugs titrated as per standard clinical monitoring).InterventionNone.MeasurementsTotal propofol consumption (TP), total fentanyl consumption (TF), on-table recovery time (T1), time to discharge (T2), intraoperative awareness (A).Main ResultsPatients in group EM demonstrated 6.7% lesser consumption of propofol (P= .01), 10.9% more consumption of fentanyl (P= .007) and 1 minute faster recovery on-table (P= .009) as compared to group CM. In the PACU, only 10% patients of group EM required supplemental analgesia as opposed to 28.3% in CM group (P= .01). Time to discharge was similar in both groups and no intraoperative awareness was noted.ConclusionEntropy monitor is a useful tool allowing distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of general anesthesia in patients undergoing TVOR and facilitating drug titration accordingly. Its impact on intraoperative awareness needs to be further evaluated.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.