• Aysun Erbahçeci Salık, Filiz Saçan İslim, and Barbaros Erhan Çil.
• Department of Radiology, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey. aysunerbahceci@yahoo.com.
• Ulus Travma Acil Cer. 2016 Nov 1; 22 (6): 531-535.

BackgroundThe present study is an evaluation of the efficacy of endovascular treatment in emergency setting for patients with acute peripheral and visceral arterial injury secondary to penetrating or blunt trauma.MethodsTwelve patients (11 men) aged 35.8±11.3 years (range: 18-56 years) with penetrating or blunt trauma who underwent endovascular treatment in our department between March 2010 and June 2014 for peripheral and visceral arterial injury were retrospectively reviewed. Selective coil embolization was performed on 11 patients and particle embolization of the injured vessel was performed on 1 patient. Criteria for endovascular treatment included active extravasation or pseudoaneurysm on contrast-enhanced computed tomography and decrease in hemoglobin level or temporary hemodynamic instability.ResultsArterial injuries were secondary to penetrating injury due to gunshot wound in 4 patients and stab wound in 5, and blunt abdominal injury as result of traffic accident in 3 patients. Traumatic lesions were in the right hepatic artery (n=3), left hepatic (n=2), right hepatic and right renal (n=1), left inferior epigastric (n=2), left facial (n=1), anterior tibial (n=1), and deep femoral (n=1) arteries. Technical success with no procedural complications was seen in all cases. Two patients died due to coexisting injuries on 29th and 43rd days of hospitalization. Median hospitalization period was 6.0 days (range: 1-43 days) and mean intensive care unit hospitalization was 7.7 days (range: 0-43 days).ConclusionIn our experience, endovascular treatment was a safe and effective option for acute traumatic peripheral and visceral arterial lesions.

61 keywords...

hide…