• Tara Madhyastha, Susan Mérillat, Sarah Hirsiger, Ladina Bezzola, Franziskus Liem, Thomas Grabowski, and Lutz Jäncke.
• Department of Radiology and Integrated Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
• Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep 1; 35 (9): 4544-55.

AbstractRelatively little is known about reliability of longitudinal diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) measurements despite growing interest in using DTI to track change in white matter structure. The purpose of this study is to quantify within- and between session scan-rescan reliability of DTI-derived measures that are commonly used to describe the characteristics of neural white matter in the context of neural plasticity research. DTI data were acquired from 16 cognitively healthy older adults (mean age 68.4). We used the Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) approach implemented in FSL, evaluating how different DTI preprocessing choices affect reliability indices. Test-Retest reliability, quantified as ICC averaged across the voxels of the TBSS skeleton, ranged from 0.524 to 0.798 depending on the specific DTI-derived measure and the applied preprocessing steps. The two main preprocessing steps that we found to improve TBSS reliability were (a) the use of a common individual template and (b) smoothing DTI data using a 1-voxel median filter. Overall our data indicate that small choices in the preprocessing pipeline have a significant effect on test-retest reliability, therefore influencing the power to detect change within a longitudinal study. Furthermore, differences in the data processing pipeline limit the comparability of results across studies.Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

19 keywords...

hide…