• Samuel Santelices, Kevin J Sullivan, Niranjan Kissoon, Laurie J Duckworth, and Suzanne P Murphy.
• University of Florida, Health Science Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
• Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Jul 1; 20 (7): 448-52.

ObjectiveTo compare simultaneous central venous pressure measurements from rigid polyurethane and soft tunneled silicone elastomere catheters.HypothesisThere will be no significant difference in central venous pressure readings between polyurethane and silastic catheters.SettingBone Marrow Transplant Unit in a tertiary care children's hospital.PatientsFive children undergoing bone marrow transplantation with preexisting polyurethane and silastic catheters.MethodsSimultaneous central venous pressure readings were obtained by 2 observers blinded to the other readings and to the type of catheter. Readings were done in triplicate (total of 690 readings). Each triplicate was averaged to 1 data point yielding 115 paired central venous pressure measurements.ResultsNo significant difference was demonstrated between polyurethane and silicone catheters (-1 +/- 3 cm H20). Using Bland and Altman method revealed no significant bias (mean = -1 cm H2O) and acceptable agreement between catheter types.ConclusionSilicone and polyurethane catheters yield similar values of central venous pressures. Permanently implanted silicone elastomere catheters can be used to measure central venous pressure in the emergency setting.

18 keywords...

hide…