• C Hernández Herrera, A Morón-Malek, A Romero-Cárdenas, M Rijlaarsdam, and J Vargas-Barrón.
• Departamento de Ecocardiografía, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Tlalpan, México, D.F.
• Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1994 Mar 1; 64 (2): 183-8.

AbstractDuring a 36 month period there were 20 patients in our hospital with aortic dissection suspected clinically. All of them were examined with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); 17 were examined with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE); six with computed tomography (CT) and seven with aortography. Twelve patients required surgery: eight with proximal aortic dissection (Type-A), two with distal dissection (Type-B) and two with aortic aneurysm without dissection. With the goal of investigating the utility of TEE for the diagnosis of aortic dissection in our hospital, we compared this and other available methods to the surgery findings. The sensitivity to TEE was 100% and the specificity 92%, with test accuracy at 92%. The sensitivity of the other tests was low: 66% with TTE; 50% with TAC; 57%, with aortography. The specificity was 90% with TTE, and higher with CT and aortography (100%). The ultrasound tests reveal additional information about complications like aortic regurgitation. Transesophageal echocardiography is the best test to examine patients with aortic dissection in our hospital. Computed tomography, aortography and magnetic resonance imaging have indication only to answer specific doubts.

23 keywords...

hide…