-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Use of a Home-Based Manual as Part of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program.
- Yves de Souza, Kenia Maynard da Silva, Diego Condesso, Bianca Figueira, Arnaldo J Noronha Filho, Rogério Rufino, Rik Gosselink, and Cláudia H da Costa.
- Department of Physical Therapy, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. souzayr@gmail.com.
- Respir Care. 2018 Dec 1; 63 (12): 1485-1491.
BackgroundPulmonary rehabilitation programs improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with COPD. Domiciliary strategies to maintain these benefits have been proposed.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether a rehabilitation manual would facilitate the maintenance of the benefits acquired during out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation.MethodsFifty subjects with stable COPD were included (26 women and 24 men). All the subjects were evaluated during screening and after 12 wk of out-patient rehabilitation, and then were randomly divided into 2 groups, with one group that received the rehabilitation manual for home use (manual group) and the other group only received verbal recommendations (control group). At this point, the 2 groups were similar. After 12 wk at home, both groups were evaluated a third time. All evaluations included a 6-min walk test (6MWT), 6-min step test, COPD Assessment Test, and measurement of dyspnea by using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.ResultsWhen comparing the results of the 6MWT and 6-min step test done at out-patient discharge and after 12 wk at home, the manual group presented no differences (6MWT, 0 ± 25 m; 6-min step test, 1 ± 32 steps), whereas the control subjects lost part of the gain obtained during rehabilitation (6MWT -46 ± 36 m; 6-min step test -39 ± 33 steps). There was a significant difference between the groups (P < .05). When comparing the same time points, the change in the COPD Assessment Test score was -1 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 2 for the control group (P = .01). For the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the change in score was 0 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 1 for the control group (P = .01).ConclusionsThe use of a simple, well-illustrated manual facilitated the maintenance of the benefits acquired in out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation over a period of 3 months after study termination.Copyright © 2018 by Daedalus Enterprises.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.