• Yuen Man Cheung, Gail Scoones, Robert Jan Stolker, and Frank Weber.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Room H-1273, P.O. box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. y.m.cheung@erasmusmc.nl.
• BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 16; 18 (1): 40.

BackgroundTo assess the thoughts of practicing anaesthesiologists about the use of depth of hypnosis monitors in children.MethodsMembers of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology were invited to participate in an online survey about their thoughts regarding the use, applicability and reliability of hypnosis monitoring in children.ResultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 30% (N = 168). A total of 138 completed surveys were included for further analysis. Sixty-eight respondents used hypnosis monitoring in children (Users) and 70 did not (Non-users). Sixty-five percent of the Users reported prevention of intra-operative awareness as their main reason to apply hypnosis monitoring. Among the Non-users, the most frequently given reason (43%) not to use hypnosis monitoring in children was the perceived lack or reliability of the devices in children. Hypnosis monitoring is used with a higher frequency during propofol anaesthesia than during inhalation anaesthesia. Hypnosis monitoring is furthermore used more frequently in children > 4 years than in younger children. An ideal hypnosis monitor should be reliable for all age groups and any (combination of) anaesthetic drug. We found no agreement in the interpretation of monitor index values and subsequent anaesthetic interventions following from it.ConclusionsPrevention of intraoperative awareness appears to be the most important reason to use hypnosis monitoring in children. The perceived lack of reliability of hypnosis monitoring in children is the most important reasons not to use it. No consensus currently exists on how to adjust anaesthesia according to hypnosis monitor index values in children.

25 keywords...

hide…