• J Am Med Dir Assoc · May 2018

    Comparative Study

    Frailty in Hospitalized Older Adults: Comparing Different Frailty Measures in Predicting Short- and Long-term Patient Outcomes.

    • Edward Chong, Esther Ho, Jewel Baldevarona-Llego, Mark Chan, Lynn Wu, Laura Tay, Yew Yoong Ding, and Wee Shiong Lim.
    • Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: edward_chong@ttsh.com.sg.
    • J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 May 1; 19 (5): 450-457.e3.

    ObjectivesData for the assessment of frailty in acutely ill hospitalized older adults remains limited. Using the Frailty Index (FI) as "gold standard," we compared (1) the diagnostic performance of 3 frailty measures (FRAIL, Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], and Tilburg Frailty Indicator [TFI]) in identifying frailty, and (2) their ability to predict negative outcomes at 12 months after enrollment.DesignProspective cohort study.ParticipantsWe recruited 210 patients (mean age 89.4 ± 4.6 years, 69.5% female), admitted to the Department of Geriatric Medicine in a 1300-bed tertiary hospital.MeasurementsPremorbid frailty status was determined. Data on comorbidities, severity of illness, functional status, and cognitive status were gathered. We compared area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) for each frailty measure against the reference FI. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the independent association between frailty and the outcomes of interest.ResultsFrailty prevalence estimates were 87.1% (FI), 81.0% (CFS), 80.0% (TFI), and 50.0% (FRAIL). AUC against FI ranged from 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.90: FRAIL) to 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95: CFS). Only FRAIL was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (6.7% vs 1.0%, P = .031). FRAIL and CFS were significantly associated with increased length of hospitalization (10 [6.0-17.5] vs 8 [5.0-14.0] days, P = .043 and 9 [5.0-17.0] vs 7 [4.25-11.75] days, P = .036, respectively). CFS and FI were highly associated with mortality at 12-month (CFS, frail vs nonfrail: 32.9% vs 2.5%, P < .001, and FI, frail vs nonfrail: 30.6% vs 3.7%, P < .001). CFS also conferred the greatest risk of 12-month mortality (odds ratio [OR] 5.78, 95% CI 3.19-10.48, P < .001) and composite outcomes of institutionalization and/or mortality (OR 3.69, 95% CI 2.31-5.88, P < .001), adjusted for age, sex, and severity of illness.ConclusionOur study affirms the utility of frailty assessment tools among older persons in acute care. FRAIL conferred highest risk of in-hospital mortality. However, CFS had greatest risk of mortality and institutionalization within 12 months.Copyright © 2017 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…