• Georgios Theodoros Liagkos, Charalampos Spyropoulos, Gerasimos Tsourouflis, Aris Papadopoulos, Paulos Ioannides, and Constantine Vagianos.
• 1st Department of Surgery, Nikaia General Hospital, Nikaia, Piraeus-Greece. gliagkos.surg@gmail.com.
• Ulus Travma Acil Cer. 2018 Mar 1; 24 (2): 104-109.

BackgroundThe non-operative management (NOM) of abdominal injuries has gained wide acceptance over the last few decades. The present study evaluated the efficacy of NOM in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at a regional Hellenic hospital.MethodsWe analyzed the results of a pre-decided treatment protocol, which was applied to all patients hospitalized for BAT, from 2008 to 2015. The protocol proposed NOM in hemodynamically stable patients with no signs of peritonitis. The demographic characteristics, type of injury, injured organ(s), type of management (operative vs. non-operative), Injury Severity Score (ISS), morbidity, mortality rates, and health costs were evaluated.ResultsOne hundred and forty-six patients hospitalized for BAT at our department were included. Among them, 49 were operated and 97 were subjected to NOM. Although ISS was significantly higher in the surgical group, the severity of injuries in liver, spleen, and kidneys was not different between the two groups. Surprisingly, no case subjected to NOM required a conversion to operative management, which may probably be because of the strict inclusion criteria for NOM.ConclusionPatients with hemodynamic stability and normal physical examination may be non-operatively treated, independent of the grade of injury, in highly selective cases. ISS score is an independent risk factor for surgical treatment.

10 keywords...

hide…