• Brandon Isaacson and Jeffrey T Vrabec.
• Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9035, USA. Brandon.Isaacson@UTSouthwestern.edu
• Otol. Neurotol. 2007 Jan 1; 28 (1): 107-10.

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion on routine temporal bone computed tomography (CT).Study DesignRetrospective case review.SettingTertiary referral center.PatientsTwo hundred seventy-eight consecutive temporal bone CT examinations for a total of 556 sides were reviewed. One hundred ninety-one sides were excluded. Reasons for exclusion included reconstructed coronal views, no coronal views, or a pathologic process, which involved the geniculate ganglion. Six examinations were from patients with clinical superior canal dehiscence confirmed by surgical repair or positive vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Twenty-four scans were from patients with radiographic superior canal dehiscence confirmed by two independent readings.Main Outcome MeasuresThe incidence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in patients with and without radiographic or clinical superior canal dehiscence. Dehiscent geniculate ganglion was defined as at least two consecutive cuts on a coronal CT showing no bone overlying the geniculate ganglion.ResultsThe overall incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion was 14.5% in the 365 sides reviewed. The incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion is increased in patients with radiographic and clinical superior canal dehiscence as compared with normal patients and was significantly different by chi analysis (38.1 versus 11.4%).ConclusionThe presence of radiographic geniculate ganglion dehiscence is common. This finding has particular importance when the middle cranial fossa or subtemporal approach is used, as the facial nerve is more at risk especially when used to address superior canal dehiscence.

31 keywords...

hide…