• Glen A Whittaker, Shannon E Munteanu, Hylton B Menz, Jade M Tan, Chantel L Rabusin, and Karl B Landorf.
• Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
• Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 1; 52 (5): 322-328.

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of foot orthoses for pain and function in adults with plantar heel pain.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain or function categorised by duration of follow-up as short (0 to 6 weeks), medium (7 to 12 weeks) or longer term (13 to 52 weeks).Data SourcesMedline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2017.Eligibility Criteria For Selecting StudiesStudies must have used a randomised parallel-group design and evaluated foot orthoses for plantar heel pain. At least one outcome measure for pain or function must have been reported.ResultsA total of 19 trials (1660 participants) were included. In the short term, there was very low-quality evidence that foot orthoses do not reduce pain or improve function. In the medium term, there was moderate-quality evidence that foot orthoses were more effective than sham foot orthoses at reducing pain (standardised mean difference -0.27 (-0.48 to -0.06)). There was no improvement in function in the medium term. In the longer term, there was very low-quality evidence that foot orthoses do not reduce pain or improve function. A comparison of customised and prefabricated foot orthoses showed no difference at any time point.ConclusionThere is moderate-quality evidence that foot orthoses are effective at reducing pain in the medium term, however it is uncertain whether this is a clinically important change.© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

16 keywords...

hide…