• World Neurosurg · Sep 2020

    Indirect Decompression Through Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Revision Surgery after Lumbar Decompression.

    • Takayoshi Shimizu, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata, and Shuichi Matsuda.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: takayosh@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
    • World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep 1; 141: e389-e399.

    BackgroundClinical outcome of indirect decompression for a revision surgery, at the same level of a previous lumbar decompression, has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in revision surgery after decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal disease.MethodsWe included 34 patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with a recurrence of canal stenosis, foraminal stenosis, or intervertebral instability at the same level of a prior lumbar decompression. These patients underwent OLIF with supplemental pedicle screw fixation without additional posterior decompression. All patients completed a minimum 1-year follow-up. We compared the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the thecal sac on magnetic resonance imaging as well as clinical outcome scores (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score) preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Fusion status and disc height/angle were evaluated based on computed tomography scans.ResultsThe CSA expanded from 136.4 ± 57.9 mm2 preoperatively to 194.1 ± 58.6 mm2 at the final follow-up (mean: 27.4 months; P < 0.001). Clinical symptoms significantly improved (59.0% improvement rate of JOA score) at the average of a 17.1-month follow-up. The fusion rate was 93.0%. The disc height was restored (preoperative: 5.7 mm; postoperative: 8.3 mm; P < 0.001), and foraminal stenosis significantly improved postoperatively. There were no major vascular/ureteral injuries.ConclusionsOLIF at the same level of a prior lumbar decompression provided a successful indirect decompressive effect, including expansion of the thecal sac, restoration of disc height, and subsequent improvement of foraminal stenosis. Specifically, this procedure can prevent incidental durotomy and nerve root injury, which may occur in conventional revision surgeries for direct posterior fusion.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.