-
Palliative medicine · Apr 2015
ReviewPatients' perception of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at the end of life.
- Loreena Hill, Sonja McIlfatrick, Brian Taylor, Lana Dixon, Mark Harbinson, and Donna Fitzsimons.
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, UK Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK Hill-L3@email.ulster.ac.uk.
- Palliat Med. 2015 Apr 1;29(4):310-23.
BackgroundIndividualised care at the end of life requires professional understanding of the patient's perception of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation.AimThe aim was to evaluate the evidence on patients' perception of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at end of life.DesignSystematic narrative review of empirical studies was published during 2008-2014.Data SourcesData were collected from six databases, citations from relevant articles and expert recommendations.ResultsIn all, 18 studies included with collective population of n = 5810. Concept mapping highlighted three themes: (1) Diverse preferences regarding discussion and deactivation. Deactivation was rarely discussed pre-implantation, with some studies demonstrating patients' reluctance to discuss implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at any stage. Two studies found the majority of patients valued such discussions. Diversity was reflected in patients' willingness to deactivate, ranging from 12% (n = 9) in Irish cohort to 79% (n = 195) in Dutch study. (2) Ethical and legal considerations were predominant in Canadian and American literature as patients wanted to contribute but felt the decision should be a doctor's responsibility. Advance directives were uncommon in Europe, and where they existed the implantable cardioverter defibrillator was not mentioned. (3) 'Living in the now' was evident as despite deteriorating symptoms many patients maintained a positive outlook and anticipated surviving more than 10 years. Several studies asserted living longer was more important than quality of life.ConclusionPatients regard the implantable cardioverter defibrillator as a complex and solely beneficial device, with little insight regarding its potential impact on a peaceful death. This review confirms the need for professionals to discuss with patients and families implantable cardioverter defibrillator functionality and deactivation at appropriate opportunities.© The Author(s) 2014.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.