• Colleen C Apostol, Julie M Waldfogel, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Donald List, Lynn S Billing, Suzanne A Nesbit, and Sydney Morss Dy.
• Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (SKCCC), Baltimore, MD, USA apostco@jhmi.edu.
• Palliat Med. 2015 Apr 1;29(4):386-90.

BackgroundCaring for cancer patients with advanced and refractory disease requires communication about care preferences, particularly when patients become ill enough to be at risk for critical care interventions potentially inconsistent with their preferences.AimTo describe the use of goals of care discussions in patients with advanced/refractory cancer at risk for critical care interventions and evaluate associations between these discussions and outcomes.DesignCohort study describing patients/families' perceptions of goals of care meetings and comparing health care utilization outcomes of patients who did and did not have discussions.Setting/ParticipantsInpatient units of an academic cancer center. Included patients had metastatic solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma or leukemia and were at risk for critical care, defined as requiring supplemental oxygen and/or cardiac monitor.ResultsOf 86 patients enrolled, 34 (39%) had a reported goals of care discussion (study group). Patients/families reported their needs and goals were addressed moderately to quite a bit during the meetings. Patients in the study group were less likely to receive critical care (0% vs 22%, p = 0.003) and more likely to be discharged to hospice (48% vs 30%, p = 0.04) than the control group. Only one patient in the study group died during the index hospitalization (on comfort care) (3%) compared with 9(17%) in the control group (p = 0.08).ConclusionGoals of care meetings for advanced/refractory cancer inpatients at risk for critical care interventions can address patient and family goals and needs and improve health care utilization. These meetings should be part of routine care for these patients.© The Author(s) 2014.

30 keywords...

hide…