• Ryan P Radecki, Kevin F Foley, Timothy S Elzinga, Cynthia P Horak, Thomas E Gant, Heather M Papp, Adam J Morris, Natalie R Hauser, and Briar L Ertz-Berger.
• Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 500 N Multnomah Ave, Portland, OR 97232. Email: ryan.p.radecki@kp.org.
• Am J Manag Care. 2019 May 1; 25 (5): e160-e164.

ObjectivesPatients with chest pain and concern for potential coronary ischemia are frequently referred to the emergency department (ED), resulting in substantial resource utilization and cost. The objective of this study was to implement a protocol for urgent care center (UCC) evaluation of potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and describe its performance.Study DesignThis is a descriptive, retrospective review of consecutive cases included in a protocol for UCC evaluation of ACS.MethodsConsecutive patient encounters from 4 urgent care facilities of our regional integrated health system were reviewed from a period spanning 4.5 months of the 2017 calendar year. The primary outcome was avoidance of an ED visit within 30 days of the index visit, and the primary safety outcome was serious adverse events (AEs) occurring in the UCC setting.ResultsThere were 802 patients evaluated, with a median age of 55 years, and 58% were female. Seventy-three (9.1%) patients were referred to the ED or hospitalized for any reason at the index visit, 10 (1.2%) of whom were ultimately diagnosed with ACS. Within 30 days, 56 (7.7%) of the remaining 729 patients had ED visits or hospitalization for any reason, 2 (0.2%) of whom received a diagnosis of ACS. Overall, 673 (83.9%) patients were managed without any ED visit. No serious AEs were recorded.ConclusionsOur initial pilot data demonstrate the feasibility of an outpatient UCC evaluation for ACS without refuting the underlying premise of safety.

27 keywords...

hide…