Journal of public health
-
Journal of public health · Sep 2004
Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the General Practice Research Database.
Antibiotic prescribing by general practitioners (GPs) increased in the 1980s and peaked in 1995. Prescribing volumes subsequently fell by over a quarter between 1995 and 2000, mostly accounted for by reduced antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory illnesses. We aimed to investigate changes in consultation rates and the proportion of consultations with antibiotics prescribed for different types of respiratory tract infections. ⋯ The reduction in antibiotic prescribing in common respiratory infections between 1994 and 2000 has occurred partly because GPs are prescribing antibiotics less frequently when patients consult but mainly because there are fewer consultations with these conditions. Further work should aim to understand the reasons for the decline in consultations for respiratory infections and whether further reductions in antibiotic prescribing are feasible.
-
Journal of public health · Sep 2004
Continuity within primary palliative care: an audit of general practice out-of-hours co-operatives.
The transfer of information between general practitioners (GPs) and their out-of-hours providers on vulnerable patient groups is essential to ensure continuity of care. This will be critical when, in 2006, NHS Direct will triage and route all out-of-hours calls. This study investigates the current use of information handover systems for palliative care patients within four out-of-hours co-operatives. ⋯ The systems in place to alert these co-operatives to the needs of palliative care patients are currently under-utilized. As services move towards an integrated approach, scrutiny of information transfer systems and encouragement of GPs and district nurses to update information, may help to ensure better continuity of care
-
Journal of public health · Sep 2004
Comparative StudyAntenatal screening for HIV; are those who refuse testing at higher risk than those who accept testing?
The UK Department of Health recommends that all pregnant women are offered screening for infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and had encouraged maternity units to achieve uptake targets of 90 per cent by the end of 2002. Many maternity units fail to meet this target and there is concern that those women who are still refusing testing may include a higher proportion of women at high risk of infection. In consequence, those infected with HIV are not being identified and are not receiving the antiviral treatment, which would be of benefit to them and reduce the risk of transmission of HIV to their babies. ⋯ There is good evidence that women refusing HIV antenatal screening have a higher prevalence of another blood-borne virus, indicating clearly that further effort must be made to increase the screening uptake and fully integrate HIV screening with other antenatal tests.