Surgical innovation
-
Surgical innovation · Dec 2008
Patient perception of medicare fee schedule of laparoscopic procedures.
It seems that public perception is that physicians receive substantial payments for procedures. This investigation explores patient perception and opinion of Medicare reimbursements to surgeons related to laparoscopic surgery. Our hypothesis was that patients think the surgeon Medicare fee schedule is higher than actuality. ⋯ Most of our patients overestimated what Medicare currently pays for some laparoscopic procedures. Surgeons need to do a better job in educating patients and the general public about the Medicare fee schedule.
-
Surgical innovation · Dec 2008
Biography Historical ArticleAn unsung hero of the laparoscopic revolution: Eddie Joe Reddick, MD.
-
Surgical innovation · Mar 2008
Randomized Controlled TrialProficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training leads to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay.
The aim of this study was to assess skill retention in the operating room following completion of a proficiency-based laparoscopic skills curriculum. Novices (n = 15) were randomized to a control and a training group that practiced to proficiency on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery suturing model. The performance of both groups was assessed on the simulator and on a live porcine laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication model at training completion (posttest) and 5 months later (retention test). ⋯ Trained participants outperformed controls, and their performance deteriorated slightly between posttests and retention tests on the simulator (505 +/- 22 vs 462 +/- 50, respectively; P < .05) but not in operating room (263 +/- 138 vs 279 +/- 88, respectively; P = .38). Proficiency-based simulator training results in durable improvement in operative skill of trainees even in the absence of practice for up to 5 months. Minute simulator performance changes do not translate to the operating room.
-
Surgical innovation · Mar 2008
Clinical TrialUse of laparoscopy in evaluation and treatment of penetrating and blunt abdominal injuries.
Use of laparoscopy in penetrating trauma has been well established; however, its application in blunt trauma is evolving. The authors hypothesized that laparoscopy is safe and feasible as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in both the patients with penetrating and blunt trauma. Trauma registry data and medical records of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy for abdominal trauma were reviewed. ⋯ Sensitivity/specificity of laparoscopy in patients with blunt and penetrating trauma was 92%/100% and 90%/100%, respectively. Overall, laparotomy was avoided in 25 (58%) patients. Use of laparoscopy in selected patients with blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma is safe, minimizes nontherapeutic laparotomies, and allows for minimal invasive management of selected intra-abdominal injuries.
-
Surgical innovation · Sep 2007
Comparative StudyTelementoring for minimally invasive surgical training by wireless robot.
Hands-on training courses with local mentoring are excellent educational tools in laparoscopic surgery; however, the need for the physical presence of specialized instructors represents a limitation because of costs, time, and geographic constraints. Remote robotic telementoring using a wireless videoconferencing mobile robot could represent an alternative to local instruction. The authors compare local active and passive mentoring with remote robotic telementoring using the wireless RP-6 Robot that worked through a WiFi 802.11b connection during a hands-on laparoscopic training session. ⋯ There was no statistical difference in the different mentoring sessions (active, passive, and remote). Mobile wireless robot is a valuable tool in laparoscopic telementoring. Robotic-assisted telementoring may not replace onsite mentoring, but it may enhance educational opportunities and the quality of hands-on training courses by implementing tutoring with expert assistance from remote locations.