Internal and emergency medicine
-
Noninvasive ventilation, both continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, has been used increasingly for acute respiratory failure over the past several years. Noninvasive ventilation has been proven to be beneficial for some causes of acute respiratory failure, most clearly for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while its use in other forms of acute respiratory failure remains more controversial. ⋯ Particular attention will be paid to the clinical situations commonly encountered by emergency medicine and general internal medicine clinicians. The potential dangers of noninvasive ventilation as well as some guidelines for clinical decision making when treating patients with this mode of ventilator support will also be discussed.
-
The clinical picture of myocardial ischemia accompanying allergic reactions is defined in the cardiologic literature as Kounis syndrome (KS) or allergic angina/myocardial infarction. In PubMed, a search for "Kounis syndrome", "allergic angina" or "allergic myocardial infarction" retrieves more than 100 results (among case reports, case series and reviews), most of which are published in cardiology/internal medicine/emergency medicine journals. In allergologic literature, heart involvement during anaphylactic reactions is well documented, but Kounis syndrome is hardly mentioned. ⋯ Putative mechanisms of an allergic acute coronary syndrome include coronary spasm or heart tissue-resident mast cell activation (precipitating coronary spasm or inducing plaque rupture and coronary or stent thrombosis) due to systemic increase of allergic mediators, or heart tissue-resident mast cell activation by local stimuli. Indeed, the pathogenic mechanism of an ACS after an allergic insult might be related to direct effects of mast cell mediators on the myocardium and the atherosclerotic plaque, or to exacerbation of preexisting disease by the hemodynamic stress of the acute allergic/anaphylactic reaction. Which of these mechanisms is most important is still unclear, and this review outlines current views in the cardiologic and allergologic literature.
-
Existing data suggest that antipyretic medications may have deleterious effects on immune function and may increase mortality in human infection. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of antipyretic therapy on 28-day in-hospital mortality when administered early in the course of gram-negative severe sepsis or septic shock. ⋯ Early antipyretic therapy was not significantly associated with 28-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.55, 0.29-1.03) in a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for APACHE-II score, hypotension, pneumonia, surgery during hospitalization, persistent fever, and in-hospital dialysis. In conclusion, early antipyretic therapy is not associated with increased mortality.