The American journal of cardiology
-
Routine aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not proved effective in randomized trials. However, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with severely reduced flow or visible thrombus, AT remains an intuitively attractive option. The use of adjunctive AT in a high-risk cohort of 158 consecutive patients with STEMI and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 0 to 1 flow or visible thrombus on baseline angiography was examined. ⋯ The AT group more frequently achieved TIMI 3 flow after the intervention (91.3% AT vs 67.9% non-AT; p <0.001) and had less residual thrombus (7.5% AT vs 19.2% non-AT; p = 0.03). AT was associated with reduced major adverse cardiac events at 6 months (6.8% AT vs 24.0% non-AT; p = 0.004) and 1 year (16.6% AT vs 29.2% non-AT; p = 0.009), and decreased mortality rates in the AT group at 6 months (5.4% AT vs 21.3% non-AT; p = 0.004) and 1 year (7.7% AT vs 26.2% non-AT; p = 0.005). In conclusion, for patients with STEMI and TIMI 0 or 1 flow or visible thrombus on baseline angiography, AT was associated with increased TIMI 3 flow rates, decreased residual thrombus, and decreased clinical events, including mortality.
-
When used for the evaluation of patients with acute symptoms in the emergency department setting, amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis or exclusion of acute destabilized heart failure (HF), with results comparable to those reported for B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing. When used for the diagnostic evaluation of the patient with possible HF, NT-proBNP testing returns information that may be superior to clinical judgment. However, the optimal application of NT-proBNP is in concert with history and physical examination, adjunctive testing, and with the knowledge of the differential diagnosis of an elevated NT-proBNP level. ⋯ However, age stratification of NT-proBNP using cut points of 450, 900, and 1,800 ng/L (for age groups of <50, 50-75, and >75 years) reduces false-negative findings in younger patients, reduces false-positive findings in older patients, and improves the overall positive predictive value of the marker without a change in overall sensitivity or specificity. Clinically validated, cost-effective algorithms for the use of NT-proBNP testing exist. Therefore, the logical use of NT-proBNP for the evaluation of the patient with suspected acute HF is useful, cost-effective, and may reduce adverse outcomes compared with standard clinical evaluation without natriuretic peptide testing.
-
In patients presenting with acute dyspnea of any cause, elevation of amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) is powerfully prognostic for adverse outcomes, including death. Among those with acute destabilized heart failure (HF), an NT-proBNP cut point of approximately 5,000 ng/L is powerfully predictive of death by 76 days after presentation. For 1-year risk stratification, an NT-proBNP value of approximately 1,000 ng/L at presentation is optimal. ⋯ In addition, multimarker approaches, including NT-proBNP, for the assessment of acute dyspnea or acute HF appear promising. Indeed, when combined with conventional markers, such as measures of renal dysfunction, anemia, myocardial injury, or inflammation, the predictive value of NT-proBNP is considerably strengthened. Given the strong value of NT-proBNP for risk assessment of the patient with acute dyspnea, a baseline measurement for all patients with dyspnea is recommended, with pretreatment and posttreatment measurement of NT-proBNP recommended for patients with an elevated value, especially those with HF.
-
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently viewed as the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). This method was introduced in our hospital in 2000. From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2004, a total of 2,393 consecutive patients with STEMI were admitted (27% transferred from 9 non-PCI hospitals and 31 prehospital emergency units/outpatient clinics). ⋯ Overall mortality rates of patients who underwent a primary PCI strategy from 2000 to 2004 were significantly lower than in the control group of 152 consecutive patients who underwent thrombolysis from 1995 to 1996 (6.2% vs 16.4%; p <0.001). In conclusion, introduction of a primary PCI strategy significantly decreased hospital mortality in our unselected group of patients with STEMI compared with the thrombolytic era. Our study further emphasized the importance of shortening myocardial ischemic time, particularly in the presence of severe heart failure on admission.