Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine reduces early and late opioid requirement after hysterectomy.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the early and late analgesic effect of preoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.25% (40 mL) compared to placebo (NaCl 0.9%, 40 mL) in patients undergoing major surgery. Forty-one patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy during general anesthesia were included. The pain management focused on pain prevention, including preoperative administration of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and peroperative administration of opioids. ⋯ With identical pain scores in the two groups, the requested total amount of buprenorphine was greater in the placebo group (2.0 [0-5.1] mg) (median and [range]) than in the bupivacaine group (0.8 [0-2.8] mg) (P < 0.05). The demand for analgesics occurred earlier in those who received placebo (225 min) than in those who received bupivacaine (345 min), but did not reach the level of significance. In conclusion, preoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine improved immediate and late postoperative pain management after hysterectomy compared to placebo.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIsoflurane anesthesia does not add to the bronchodilating effect of a beta 2-adrenergic agonist after tracheal intubation.
This double-blind study investigates whether isoflurane/N2O anesthesia adds to the bronchodilating effect of the beta 2-adrenergic agonist, fenoterol, after an endotracheal tube (ETT)-induced increase in airway resistance. Forty-five patients with ASA physical status I-II were randomly assigned to two groups: fenoterol-treated patients (n = 23) were given three metered-dose inhaler puffs (600 micrograms) of fenoterol 10 min before induction of anesthesia and placebo-treated patients (n = 22) received three puffs of an aerosol containing no medication. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and vecuronium intravenously. ⋯ Rrs declined by a mean of 17.1% after 30 min of inhalation anesthesia in the placebo-treated patients but declined by only 1.4% in the fenoterol-treated patients (P < 0.05 for fenoterol provides protection versus placebo). Our results confirm that fenoterol provides protection against ETT-induced increase of airway resistance. However, isoflurane, while a potent bronchodilator, does not add to the effect of fenoterol.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of costs and efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol as prophylactic antiemetic therapy for elective outpatient gynecologic procedures.
Ondansetron and droperidol are both effective prophylactic antiemetics for gynecologic outpatient procedures. However, increased drowsiness, delayed discharge, and postdischarge restlessness may occur with droperidol, and ondansetron is costly. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 161 women, we compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ondansetron (4 mg intravenously [i.v.] with droperidol (0.65 mg or 1.25 mg i.v.) in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after outpatient gynecologic surgery. ⋯ The incidence of PONV in the hospital and after discharge, the need for rescue antiemetic therapy, and recovery and discharge times were similar for the ondansetron and both droperidol groups but differed significantly from those for the placebo group. The cost-effectiveness ratios for both droperidol 0.65 mg and 1.25 mg groups were significantly lower than those for the ondansetron and placebo groups. We conclude that droperidol 0.625 mg i.v. provides antiemetic prophylaxis comparable to that of ondansetron 4 mg i.v. without increasing side effects or delaying discharge and is most cost-effective.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Multicenter StudyPercutaneous injuries in anesthesia personnel.
Anesthesia personnel are at risk for occupationally acquired blood-borne infections from human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis viruses, and others after percutaneous exposures to infected blood or body fluids. The risk is greater after an infected, blood-contaminated, percutaneous injury, especially from a hollow-bore blood-filled needle, than from other types of exposures. Few data are available on the specific occupational hazards to anesthesia personnel from needles and other sharp devices. ⋯ Most CPI occurred between steps of a multistep procedure (8%), were recapping related (13%), or occurred at other times after use (41%). No CPI were reported from use of needlestick-prevention safety devices. The devices and mechanisms of injury identified in this study provide specific data that may lead to prevention strategies to reduce the risk of PI.