The International journal of artificial organs
-
Clinical Trial
Prognosis and outcome of neonates treated either with veno-arterial (VA) or veno-venous (VV) ECMO.
A comparison was done between neonates requiring veno-arterial (VA) ECMO (too small jugular vein, inability to insert a 12 Fr double lumen catheter or cardio-circulatory instability) and neonates treated with veno-venous (VV) ECMO in the same period of time. From 1991-1995 ECMO was done in 48 neonates after failure of maximum conventional treatments, NO-inhalation and HFOV. 30/48 babies were treated with VV-ECMO, with a switch to VA-ECMO later on in 3 of them. In 18 infants VA-ECMO was installed primarily. ⋯ The mortality rates were 43% (VA) and 15% (VV), p < 0.05. About one third of neonatal ECMO candidates will be treated with VA-ECMO, even if the VV-ECMO technique is available. Need for VA-ECMO implies--due to a higher number of preterm babies and a greater severity of illness before ECMO--a higher incidence of ICH's and a higher mortality rate.
-
Before the entry criteria for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are met, newborns may require aggressive mechanical ventilation which may result in lung injury. The question arises whether the presence of a pneumothorax in these infants plays a role in the prognosis. ⋯ Infants who developed a pneumothorax but did not meet ECMO criteria and remained in the oxygenation index (OI) range between 25 and 40 for more than 2 days had a poorer prognosis. If adequate oxygenation cannot be attained with acceptable mechanical ventilation and a more aggressive ventilation results in a pneumothorax, ECMO should be considered even if the oxygenation index is below 40.