Pharmacotherapy
-
Review Comparative Study
Emesis as a complication of cancer chemotherapy: pathophysiology, importance, and treatment.
Up to 30% of patients receiving chemotherapy experience uncontrolled nausea and vomiting despite pharmacotherapeutic advances. Currently marketed agents used to treat these symptoms are compared. ⋯ Recent focus has been on a new class of antiemetics, the serotonin antagonists. Ondansetron, currently the only serotonin antagonist with Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis, demonstrates the efficacy and potential advantages of this class of antiemetics.
-
Review Comparative Study
Problems and dilemmas of antimicrobial resistance.
An important obstacle to the long-term efficacy of an antimicrobial agent is the appearance and spread of resistance to the agent. The fact that many antimicrobials are produced by microorganisms in nature may provide long-term selective pressure for the emergence of resistance in antibiotic-producing as well as -nonproducing organisms. Indeed, the rapidity with which many resistances have appeared after the introduction of a new antibiotic suggests that these resistance genes were already present somewhere in nature prior to clinical use. ⋯ The most important resistances seen in community-acquired organisms include beta-lactam resistance in pneumococci and combined ampicillin and chloramphenicol resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Shigellae resistant to essentially all commonly used oral agents are also a problem, particularly in developing countries. No end is in sight to the problem of antimicrobial resistance, and thus new strategies to prevent infections and control resistant organisms continue to be necessary.
-
This retrospective study was designed to identify and assess which patient-specific factors affect the relationship between the steady-state trough serum quinidine concentration (SQC) measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and quinidine dosage. Data were obtained from 100 hospitalized patients (72 males, 28 females) receiving quinidine for atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, or both, between ages 24 and 85 years (mean age 63 yrs). Age, lean body weight, creatinine clearance (ClCr), and sex were statistically significant factors affecting this relationship; ejection fraction, total body weight, smoking history, alcohol history, recent myocardial infarction, recent surgery, elevated liver function tests, and sampling time were not statistically significant. ⋯ Currently in clinical practice, quinidine dosage adjustments are not routinely recommended for patients with renal insufficiency. These data suggest that the calculated ClCr is important in predicting both SQC and dosage when a nonspecific quinidine assay is used. This dosing model must be evaluated prospectively.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Evaluation of an ibuprofen controlled-release tablet and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Seventy-four outpatients with postoperative pain after oral surgery were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single oral dose of a controlled-release tablet (CRT) containing 600 mg ibuprofen, two 600-mg ibuprofen CRTs, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medicating. Estimates of total and peak analgesia were derived from these subjective reports. ⋯ Comparable effect for the two ibuprofen CRT dosages could suggest a plateau in analgesia at the 600-mg level or a lack of upside assay sensitivity. Duration of effect was longer for the CRTs than we have previously observed with conventional ibuprofen tablets. Adverse effects were transitory and consistent with the known pharmacologic profile of the medication evaluated.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen 1000 mg, acetaminophen 2000 mg, and the combination of acetaminophen 1000 mg and codeine phosphate 60 mg versus placebo in acute postoperative pain.
Acetaminophen (APAP) 1000 mg, APAP 2000 mg, the combination of APAP 1000 mg plus codeine phosphate 60 mg (APAPCOD), and placebo (PBO) were compared in a 6-hour, randomized, single-dose, double-blind, parallel-group analgesic trial. All active treatments were statistically superior (p less than 0.05) to placebo for 4 hours after medication with respect to pain intensity (PI) and pain intensity difference (PID), and up to 3 hours regarding pain relief (PAR). The combination scored better than all other treatments on the summary analgesic efficacy measures sum PI (SUMPI), sum PID (SPID), and total PAR (TOTPAR). ⋯ Acetaminophen 2000 mg showed marginal numerical superiority over 1000 mg for SUMPI, but was not statistically superior for any summary efficacy measure. The 2000-mg dose was numerically inferior to APAPCOD for every summary efficacy measure and statistically inferior regarding SPID and MAXPAR. We concluded that codeine 60 mg added to acetaminophen 1000 mg offers analgesic advantages, and acetaminophen reaches an analgesic ceiling effect at 1000 mg using the dental pain model.