Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Phase II and dose-escalation with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor study of 9-aminocamptothecin in relapsed and refractory lymphomas.
To assess the efficacy and maximum dose-intensity of a new topoisomerase I (topo I)-targeting agent, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC), in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas. ⋯ 9-AC had a reasonable response rate of 25% in heavily pretreated patients. The low response rate in patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease suggests that there is cross-resistance between 9-AC and standard chemotherapy. However, there was no association between 9-AC response and the number of prior regimens. Due to dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, G-CSF support did not increase dose-intensity, although individual patients benefited from the use of G-CSF.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: an Intergroup study.
The Intergroup conducted this breast cancer adjuvant trial to compare an investigational 16-week regimen with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (5-FU; CAF). The 16-week regimen features greater doxorubicin and 5-FU dose-intensity than CAF and improved scheduling of antimetabolites with sequential methotrexate and 5-FU, as well as infusion 5-FU. ⋯ The 16-week regimen produced marginally better breast cancer outcomes than CAF with similar toxicity but a greater reduction in during-treatment quality of life. The 16-week regimen should not be used instead of a standard-dose regimen without careful consideration of the 16-week regimen's pros and cons, which include its complicated schedule. It should probably not be tested further, but its antimetabolite schedules and frequent drug administration (ie, dose density) should be considered in the development of new regimens.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Intensification of preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering (T12) protocol.
It has been observed previously in osteosarcoma (OS) that the degree of necrosis of the resected primary tumor following a period of preoperative chemotherapy is predictive of subsequent event-free survival (EFS). The aim of this study was to determine if more intensive preoperative chemotherapy would increase the proportion of patients with a good histologic response and improve EFS. ⋯ Despite modest increases in the proportion of patients with good histologic response with intensified preoperative chemotherapy, no improvement in EFS was observed.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Phase I trial of 9-aminocamptothecin in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.
A phase I trial of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) was performed in children with solid tumors to establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the pharmacokinetic profile in children and to document any evidence of activity. ⋯ The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC administered as a 72-hour infusion every 21 days to children with solid tumors is 52 microg/m2 per hour. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting.
-
To address the challenging ethical dilemmas created from the participation of advanced cancer patients in phase I trials, we assessed the feasibility of a clinical trial design that uses an interactive informed consent process in which patient-subjects can choose to become directly involved in decisions of dose escalation. ⋯ Although complex, our innovative phase I trial design is feasible. In addition to the use of cohort-specific consent, the trial design may reduce the magnitude of many of the commonly recognized ethical dilemmas associated with this form of clinical research, which include difficulties with information provision and the understanding of possible risks and benefits of phase I trial participation, through direct subject involvement in research decision making by otherwise potentially vulnerable cancer patients.