Journal of vascular surgery
-
Comparative Study
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been advocated as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in high-risk surgical patients, including stenosis after CEA. This study compared early and midterm clinical outcomes for primary CAS vs CAS for post-CEA stenosis. ⋯ CAS for post-CEA stenosis carried a lower risk of early postprocedural neurologic events than primary CAS, with a trend toward a higher restenosis rate during follow-up.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results.
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST) completed randomization on July 18, 2008. Sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the trial has enrolled 2,522 participants across North America and is the largest randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). ⋯ Credentialing of interventionalists also included a review of additional CAS procedures enrolled into a CREST lead-in phase prior to entering patients into the randomized trial; 1564 patients were enrolled in the lead-in, the final pathway for the largest credentialing effort to date for any clinical trial. CREST will provide long-term follow-up after carotid revascularization based on systematic ultrasonographic and neurologic surveillance, and on quality of life and cost-effectiveness comparisons between CAS and CEA in the setting of a RCT. We present a brief description of the CREST protocol, impediments that were overcome during the trial, salient results from the lead-in phase of the trial, a summary of enrollment activities and characteristics of the final cohort, and a timeline for anticipated results from the randomized phase.
-
Comparative Study
Laparoscopic-assisted treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm requiring suprarenal cross-clamping.
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was previously employed to treat patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA). The use of HALS for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA) has never been validated. In this study, we report our experience with this technique to demonstrate its feasibility and prove its safety in dealing with JAAA. ⋯ The HALS technique proved to be feasible and safe not only for patients with IAAA, but also for the management of patients with JAAA. No significant difference could be shown in the comparison between the two groups, apart from the expected higher rate of postoperative renal dysfunction after suprarenal clamping. In view of the demonstrated benefit of this minimally invasive approach, we believe that it should be included among the alternative options of treatment for these patients.
-
This study evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty (PTBA) of the hepatic vein in the management of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) secondary to hepatic venous outflow obstruction. ⋯ PTBA of the hepatic vein is a safe and effective treatment of BCS. It is currently the most physiologic procedure, and the risk of postoperative encephalopathy is minimized because portal flow is not diverted. Midterm outcomes are satisfactory. Further investigation of the long-term outcomes is needed.
-
Multicenter Study
Acute management of aortobronchial and aortoesophageal fistulas using thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
Aortobronchial fistula (ABF) and aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) are rare but lethal if untreated; open thoracic surgery is associated with high operative mortality and morbidity. In this case series, we sought to investigate outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for emergency cases of ABF and AEF. ⋯ TEVAR does prevent immediate exsanguination in patients admitted with AEF and ABF, but after initial deployment of the endograft and control of the hemodynamic status, most patients, in particular those with AEF, are at risk for infectious complications. Early esophageal repair after TEVAR appears to improve the survival in case of AEF. Therefore, TEVAR may serve as a bridge to surgery in emergency cases of AEF with subsequent definitive open operative repair of the esophageal defect as soon as possible. In patients with ABF, additional open surgery may not be necessary after the endovascular procedure.