Der Unfallchirurg
-
Case Reports
[Limb salvage versus amputation after severe lower extremity injury : Cases from clinical practice].
Following severe lower extremity injury, the potential outcome of a salvage procedure might often be questionable. Objective criteria should help in decision-making. From the clinical practice of a level I trauma center, we demonstrate three case reports and approaches following severe lower extremity injury.
-
Deciding between reconstruction and primary amputation after severe high-energy trauma to the lower extremities is difficult and consequential. The Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) prospectively included and investigated patients with severe, limb-threatening injuries below the femur, with third-grade open fractures, defined soft-tissue damage and amputation wounds. This paper aims to review the key results of the LEAP study, which were published in several parts, in due consideration of the newer relevant literature, and to deduce the consequences for clinical practice. ⋯ Loss of muscle seems to be more momentous than loss of bone. Any accompanying injuries that should be taken into account in the individual treatment concepts are crucial to the results, in addition to comorbidities and other individual patient-related factors, such as alcoholism, smoking, insurance, and social background. Psychological impairment is frequent after these injuries and should therefore be addressed regularly with regard to rehabilitation.
-
Prosthetic replacement after amputation or loss of function of the upper extremity has gained therapeutic value over the last years. The control of upper arm prostheses has been refined by the use of selective nerve transfers, and the indication for prosthetic replacement has been expanded. ⋯ Selective nerve transfers of the amputated nerves of the brachial plexus to the remaining stump muscles can create up to six myosignals for intuitive and simultaneous control of the different prosthetic joints. This way, an efficient and harmonious control of the prosthetic device is possible without the need to change between the different control levels. The prosthetic replacement, with consequent elective amputation, represents a new approach in the functional reconstruction of the upper extremity, especially in patients with a functionless hand after massive soft tissue or nerve damage.
-
The quality of the primary care of Gustilo-Anderson (GA) type IIIB and IIIC extremity injuries is crucial to the success of the limb salvage procedure. This article provides a compilation of consistent, but often controversially discussed aspects of initial debridement, modern techniques of lavage and wound closure, in addition to current issues on the application of antibiotics and antiseptics, based on our own experiences and the latest literature. The following points should be stressed. ⋯ Rinsing of the wound should be performed with 3-9 L and only slight manual pressure (no jet lavage). The definitive primary closure of a wound should be achieved in the initial operation, but only in the case of certain "decontamination" and overall vitality of the wound (GA I and II). In the presence of high-grade injuries, a temporary vacuum sealing technique can be used until the earliest possible definitive plastic surgical wound closure.