International journal of obstetric anesthesia
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of early epidural block administration on the progression and outcome of labor.
This study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate the effect of early administration of epidural bupivacaine (0.25%) on the progression and outcome of labor in 60 nulliparous patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. ⋯ There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in rate of cervical dilatation, duration of the second stage, numbers of instrumental deliveries or cesarean sections or Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. We conclude that there is no need to restrict epidural top-ups until cervical dilatation of 4 cm, when active management of labor is advocated.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialComparison of three different loading doses to establish epidural analgesia in labour.
Women requesting epidural analgesia were randomized to receive one of three loading doses. Group 1 received a single dose of bupivacaine 9.375 mg (15 ml of 0.0625%) containing fentanyl 37.5 microg and adrenaline 37.5 microg group 2 received a single dose of bupivacaine 15 mg (15 ml of 0.1%) containing fentanyl 30 microg and adrenaline 30 microg and group 3 received a test dose of bupivacaine 10 mg (4 ml of 0.25% - test) followed 5 min later by bupivacaine 20 mg (8 ml of 0.25% - loading). ⋯ Speed of onset of analgesia was the same in all three groups, with the majority of women achieving satisfactory analgesia by 20 min. Motor block was significantly increased in group 3 at 30 min, but by 1 h there was no difference in motor block between the groups.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAlternating patient position following the induction of obstetric epidural analgesia does not affect local anaesthetic spread.
To assess the influence of gravity on epidural-induced sensory blockade during the first stage of labour, 60 parturients were recruited to a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. In all cases an epidural catheter was placed with the patient in the left lateral position. Thereafter, patients were randomized to one of three groups. ⋯ Time to maximal block was 14.7 +/- 2.3 min, 14.1 +/- 1.6 min and 13.9 +/- 1.5 min for groups L, L+R and S respectively. After maximal blockade, pain scores were significantly (P<0.0001) decreased in all groups, with no differences between them. We conclude that position immediately following local anaesthetic drug administration has little effect on onset and distribution of epidural analgesia.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialVolume preload: lack of effect in the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section.
A randomized double-blind study of 40 women was performed to compare blood pressure changes between two groups of women following induction of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. One group received a 1 L Ringer's solution preload, administered over 10 min, before spinal anaesthesia while the other group received no preload. ⋯ There were no differences between the groups in terms of neonatal outcome as assessed by Apgar score, umbilical arterial and venous blood pH, and Neonatal Adaptive Capacity Scores. When ephedrine is infused prophylactically immediately following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section, a 1000 ml crystalloid preload confers no advantages in terms of maternal blood pressure control or neonatal outcome.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAnalgesia produced by epidural diamorphine is better following caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia than under epidural anaesthesia.
In a randomized double-blind study, the efficacy, duration of action and side-effects of epidural diamorphine 2.5 mg in 10 ml normal saline were compared following elective caesarean section under either spinal anaesthesia (using a combined spinal epidural technique, n = 32) or conventional epidural anaesthesia (n = 26). Median visual analogue pain scores were consistently lower in patients who had received spinal anaesthesia and this reached significance at 24 h (P = 0.02). ⋯ The incidence of side-effects was similar in the two groups. The improved analgesia following spinal anaesthesia is another advantage of the combined spinal epidural technique over conventional epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.