American heart journal
-
American heart journal · Aug 1976
Comparative StudyLiving with prosthetic heart valves. Subsequent noncardiac operations and the risk of thromboembolism or hemorrhage.
A total of 111 survivors of prosthetic valve insertion were followed an average of 4 years to assess the risk of thromboembolism or hemorrhage. Non-cloth-covered ball and/or disc valve prostheses were used, and all patients received long-term anticoagulant therapy. During the follow-up period the patients with mitral or combined valve replacement suffered four times more thromboembolic episodes and had a poorer survival rate than the patients with isolated aortic valve replacement. ⋯ Unanticipated hemorrhage was encountered in four of nine patients in whom anticoagulation was maintained during surgery. Cessation of anticoagulation for 3 to 5 days appears safe in patients with aortic prostheses who require subsequent noncardiac operations. The incidence of thromboembolism in patients after mitral or combined valve replacement is high and constitutes a major risk whether or not a subsequent operation is required.