Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of lignocaine with prilocaine in axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia.
Twenty patients received either lignocaine 1.5% with 1/200,000 adrenaline (group L), or prilocaine 1.5% plain (group P) as a brachial plexus block for surgery to the upper limb, in a randomised double-blind study. The two groups were comparable in age, weight and duration of surgery and there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to onset, pattern or degree of sensory loss. ⋯ All the blocks were performed using the same technique and provided complete surgical anaesthesia. Prilocaine 1.5% plain provides adequate sensory and motor blockade for brachial plexus anaesthesia and is a suitable agent for medium duration surgery to the upper limb.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Double-blind comparison of epidural diamorphine and intramuscular morphine after elective caesarean section, with computerised analysis of continuous pulse oximetry.
A randomised, double-blind comparison of the efficacy, duration of action and side effects of two analgesic regimens following elective epidural Caesarean section is described. Patients received epidural diamorphine 3 mg or intramuscular morphine 10 mg in the immediate postoperative period. Time to next analgesia was longer after epidural diamorphine (11.0 hours) compared to intramuscular morphine (6.5 hours) (p less than 0.05). ⋯ However, more patients in the diamorphine group required catheterisation and suffered emetic sequelae, whereas more patients in the morphine group were sedated at 8 hours. Ten patients in each group had continuous pulse oximetry performed overnight after administration of the trial medications. Neither group demonstrated evidence of hypoxia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The haemodynamic effects of bronchoscopy. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone with and without alfentanil pretreatment.
The haemodynamic response to bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia was investigated. Forty patients were allocated at random to receive either thiopentone or propofol; half the patients in each group received in addition 18 micrograms/kg of alfentanil one minute before induction of anaesthesia. The heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure and Holter ECG was monitored in all patients. ⋯ No significant haemodynamic changes were seen in either of the groups which received propofol. ST segment changes on subsequent Holter analysis were seen in four patients, but there were no significant differences between the groups. Anaesthesia with propofol alone provides adequate haemodynamic stability for bronchoscopy and the addition is superfluous.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intubation with propofol augmented with intravenous lignocaine.
Sixty patients of ASA grade 1 and aged 18 to 55 years were admitted to a double-blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg/kg after intravenous pretreatment with lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg or a similar volume of isotonic saline. The quality of subsequent tracheal intubation was graded and the pressor response to tracheal intubation assessed. There were no significant differences between treatment groups.