Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Comparative Study
Impact of trauma center designation on outcomes: is there a difference between Level I and Level II trauma centers?
Within organized trauma systems, both Level I and Level II trauma centers are expected to have the resources to treat patients with major multisystem trauma. The evidence supporting separate designations for Level I and Level II trauma centers is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to compare mortality and complications for injured patients admitted to Level I and Level II trauma centers. ⋯ Severely injured patients admitted to Level I trauma centers have a lower risk of mortality compared with patients admitted to Level II centers. These findings support the continuation of a 2-tiered designation system for trauma.
-
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has improved the survival of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. On recurrence, a repeat CRS/HIPEC is a treatment option. ⋯ In experienced tertiary centers and for selected patients, a repeat CRS/HIPEC procedure has morbidity and mortality similar to the initial cytoreduction. Survival depends primarily on the completion of the repeat cytoreduction and favorable biology of the tumor.
-
The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Case Log represents a data system that satisfies the American Board of Surgery (ABS) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program, yet has broad data fields for surgical subspecialties. Using the ACS Case Log, we have developed a method of data capture, categorization, and reporting of acute care surgery fellows' experiences. ⋯ Using the ACS Case Log satisfies the ABS MOC program requirements and provides a method for monitoring and reporting acute care surgery fellow experiences. This system is flexible to accommodate the needs of surgical subspecialties and their training programs. As documentation requirements expand, efficient clinical documentation is a must for the busy surgeon. Although, our data entry and processing method has the immediate capacity for acute care surgery fellowships nationwide, multiple larger decisions regarding national case log systems should be encouraged.
-
The ability to assess and compare the impact of postoperative complications in major cancer surgery is currently limited. The Accordion Severity Grading System provides the opportunity to categorize complications according to treatment responses and resource use. ⋯ The Accordion Severity Grading System provides a meaningful approach to classifying complications according to resource use, which also directly correlates with treatment costs and length of stay. Survival is affected by overall occurrence of complications, but was not related to individual Accordion grades in this study. The Accordion Severity Grading System should be a component of prospective data collections and can be used in major cancer surgery to study areas appropriate for quality improvement and cost containment.
-
The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of nonverifiable research publications among applicants to a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program. ⋯ In this analysis of academic integrity, one-fifth of all applicants applying to a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program and 30% of those with 1 or more peer-reviewed publications had nonverifiable publications listed in their curricula vitae. These applicants were less likely to be in the military, more likely to have presented their work at surgical meetings and to have 3 or more peer-reviewed publications.