Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
-
Pleural effusions in patients with hematologic malignancy may represent malignant pleural effusion (MPE) or occur secondary to infection, treatment effects, and other common causes. The impact of MPE on prognosis in this cohort remains unclear. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are routinely placed for palliation of recurrent symptomatic MPEs, but perceived concerns over infection and bleeding may limit their use in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, recent evidence suggests IPCs are both well tolerated and effective in this cohort. In this review, the evaluation of pleural effusions in hematologic malignancies and their management with an IPC are outlined. ⋯ Pleural effusions in patients with hematologic malignancies may be managed safely with an IPC. Sterile technique, barrier protection, standardized algorithms for placement and removal, and quality assurance initiatives are crucial to centers that place IPCs for all patients. The safety of IPC in hematologic malignancies warrants a paradigm shift in the management of pleural disease for this cohort.
-
Review Comparative Study
Comparison of treatment of hepatic hydrothorax with catheter drainage versus serial thoracentesis.
Hepatic hydrothorax is a nonmalignant pleural effusion associated with portal hypertension that may cause increased morbidity or mortality in cirrhotic patients. For patients who are refractory to salt restriction and diuretics, thoracentesis and catheter drainage are necessary for symptomatic relief. This review aimed to identify the best drainage method in patients with hepatic hydrothorax. ⋯ The recent evidence supports series thoracentesis as the first-line drainage method in cases of hepatic hydrothorax compared with catheter drainage. Further prospective, randomized, controlled trials are necessary to further evaluate the mortality and complication rates of catheter drainage compared with thoracentesis in cirrhotic patients.