Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
-
The Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic caused the Japanese government to declare a State of Emergency on April 7, 2020. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the effects of the pandemic on surgical cases at a university hospital trauma center. ⋯ During the State of Emergency in Japan, the number of operations for trauma patients at the trauma center decreased, but surgeries for hip fracture increased.
-
Short-term results of several short-stem designs have indicated early axial migration. Mid- and long-term results for most designs are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mid-term migration pattern of a calcar-guided short stem five years postoperative. ⋯ In most cases, even in the group of stems being "at hazard", settling could be documented. While different Dorr types did not show a statistically significant impact on axial migration, particularly in male and heavy-weight patients the risk of continuous subsidence is increased. In those 4 cases with further migration, undersizing of the stem could be recognized. At present, clinical consequences are still uncertain.
-
The optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remains controversial. Recently, laminectomy/laminoplasty with instrumented fusion (LAMF) has been increasingly applied to treat CSM. However, few comprehensive studies have compared anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and LAMF. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence in the literature and to compare the surgical outcomes between the 2 procedures. Since the surgical outcomes and risks differ between patients with CSM and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and between only posterior decompression and decompression with fusion treatments, we excluded patients with OPLL and patients with only posterior decompression in this review. ⋯ While the ADF and LAMF groups demonstrated similar results in terms of neurological recovery, postoperative cervical lordosis and NDI scores were more favorable with ADF than with LAMF. The overall complication rate was similar between the ADF and LAMF groups. Surgeons should understand the merits and shortcomings of both procedures when deciding on a surgical procedure.
-
Residual acetabular deficiency after periacetabular reorientation osteotomy can result in suboptimal outcome. The optimal algorithm of acetabular fragment correction to achieve normal anterolateral acetabular coverage is not well characterized. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of residual anterolateral deficiency after lateral acetabular rotation and to evaluate the ability of additional sagittal and axial rotation of the acetabulum to normalize the acetabular coverage in periacetabular osteotomy. ⋯ Normal anterolateral coverage was achieved in 79% of patients after rotating the acetabulum laterally. However, lateral rotation of the acetabulum may be insufficient to correct the anterolateral deficiency in patients with an anterior CEA of <37°. In them, additional 10°-15° anterior sagittal rotation may be appropriate to achieve sufficient anterolateral coverage while retaining posterolateral coverage.
-
Comparative Study
Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Numerous minimal invasive techniques treating lumbar spinal stenosis have been introduced. Clinical results using biportal endoscopic spinal surgery has recently been introduced as a treatment option for lumbar spinal stenosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcome between microscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. ⋯ Two different decompression techniques preserve the spinal structure and exhibit a favorable clinical outcome and have the advantage of not causing postoperative instability in the short term follow up. Biportal endoscopic surgery may leads to less postoperative back pain than microscopic surgery, which may allow early ambulation and shorter hospitalization period.