Journal of palliative medicine
-
Comparative Study
Tracheostomy Decision Making and Counseling: Comparing Providers' and Caregivers' Perspectives and Perceptions.
Background: The decision to place a tracheostomy in children is complex and involves factors beyond the medical procedure, including quality of life, values, and goals. Providers play an important role in counseling caregivers and guiding them through the decision-making process. There are no established guidelines for tracheostomy counseling, leading to variations in practice. ⋯ Conclusion: In conclusion, our study highlights a disconnect between caregivers and healthcare providers regarding tracheostomy counseling. These differing perspectives underscore the need for improved communication and understanding between the two groups. Recognizing these differences can help providers tailor their counseling approaches to better align with the values and priorities of families when making decisions about tracheostomy.
-
Background: As a key component of advance care planning, serious illness conversations form a core intervention in palliative care. To achieve effective serious illness conversations, acknowledgment and inclusion of patient sense of self and identity are critical. However, no framework exists to describe how goals, values, and choices relate to patient identity. ⋯ The framework consists of a four-step, reproducible approach: (1) attend to patient narrative identity, (2) identify values, (3) cocreate goals, and (4) actively promote choices. In short: attend, identify, create, and promote (AICP). Discussion: By using this conceptual framework and four-step approach, clinicians can accomplish goal-concordant serious illness care and build rich clinical relationships that foster trust and goodwill.
-
Background: To operationalize the palliative care approach and improve care across services, a palliative care pathway (PCP) was developed in Western Norway. The PCP is an evidence-based framework for palliative care assessment and interventions in the form of a web-based flowchart. Measures: An electronic questionnaire aimed at health care professionals (HCPs) examined perceived usability and content. ⋯ They found the PCP easily accessible but asked for a search option and easier webpage navigation. Conclusions/Lessons Learned: An available PCP can support a common language for palliative care in different settings and enhance patient-centered care. HCPs need time to familiarize themselves with its content and use.
-
Background: The importance of high-quality care for terminal patients is being increasingly recognized; however, quality of care (QOC) and quality of death and dying (QOD) for noncancer patients remain unclear. Objectives: To clarify QOC and QOD according to places and causes of death. Design, Subjects: A nationwide mortality follow-back survey was conducted using death certificate data for cancer, heart disease, stroke syndrome, pneumonia, and kidney failure in Japan. ⋯ The prevalence of symptoms was higher for cancer than for other causes of death. Conclusions: QOC and QOD were higher at home than in other places of death across all causes of death. The further expansion of end-of-life care options is crucial for improving QOC and QOD for all terminal patients.