J Trauma
-
Assess the workload caused by elective routine removals of internal fracture fixation devices in a large university orthopedic and trauma unit when no premeditated departmental removal policy existed. ⋯ Without a strict departmental removal policy, a remarkable portion of the resources allocated for elective orthopedic operations was spent on routine hardware removal procedures. A more rational and selective attitude toward implant removals is desirable. Further research on the disadvantages of retained hardware and the complications of implant removals is required.
-
To examine hospital, trauma system, and reimbursement factors that offset the financial burdens of trauma care delivery and to assess how proposed Medicaid and Medicare budget cuts may affect the ability of hospitals to alleviate financial pressures related to trauma care delivery. ⋯ Proposed Medicaid and Medicare payment cuts are likely to eliminate the delicate financial balance that many urban hospitals have achieved in providing trauma care. The erosion in funding from public programs may portend a new wave of trauma center closures as hospitals seek to deal with reduced reimbursement by eliminating unprofitable services.
-
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 12 who had the trauma team involved (TTA) in their resuscitative care to those that did not (TTNA). ⋯ In a Level I trauma center, the outcomes of trauma patients with an ISS > 12 are statistically significantly better if the trauma team is activated than if the patients are managed on an individual service-by-service basis.