Surg J R Coll Surg E
-
Surg J R Coll Surg E · Oct 2011
Enhanced recovery in major colorectal surgery: safety and efficacy in an unselected surgical population at a UK district general hospital.
Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERPs) have been shown to benefit recovery following major surgery in selected centres and patient groups, but their wider applicability requires continued evaluation. The aims of this study were to assess the outcomes of the first 400 consecutive, non-selected patients, undergoing major elective colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery programme at a UK District General hospital and to examine the effects of patient risk factors and operative approach on outcomes. ⋯ Unselected application of an ERP in our unit has been associated with reductions in post-operative LOS. The ERP was safe and effective when applied to all our study patients independent of age and BMI. Despite LOS being longer in ASA grade 3 patients, application of the ERP to this higher risk group was not associated with significantly increased morbidity or mortality. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in additional modest reductions in LOS compared to open surgery within the ERP.
-
Surg J R Coll Surg E · Aug 2011
ReviewThe effects of tobacco smoking on the incidence and risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications in adults.
Despite the warnings of health hazards of cigarette smoking, still one third of the population in industrial countries smoke. This review was conducted with the aim of exploring the effects of preoperative tobacco smoking on the risk of intra- and postoperative complications and to identify the value of preoperative smoking cessation. ⋯ It is widely documented that stopping smoking before surgery has substantial health benefits in the longer term and should be recommended to every smoker in order for them to gain maximum benefit from their treatment. However, identification of the optimal period of preoperative smoking cessation on postoperative complications cannot be determined.
-
Surg J R Coll Surg E · Jun 2011
ReviewChanging to endovenous treatment for varicose veins: how much more evidence is needed?
Surgical ligation and stripping of varicose veins has been the accepted treatment for almost a century but within the last decade this has been challenged by endovenous thermal and chemical ablation methods. Surgery is not without significant complications including paraesthesia and has reflux recurrence rates of up to 54% at five years, even though it has been shown to provide significant health-related quality of life benefits cost-effectively. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation are all consistently proving to be at least as beneficial as surgery, without the same complications and with less post-procedure morbidity and more rapid recovery. ⋯ Patients are entitled to a range of treatment strategies, particularly when complex and recurrent venous disease has such unacceptably high surgical complication and recurrence rates compared to endovenous alternatives. There is questionable logic in procrastinating until there is more convincing evidence. Now is the time for vascular surgeons to enhance their ultrasound skills and future-proof their venous practice for the benefits of patients and institutions.
-
Fast-track surgery (FTS) is a set of protocols aimed to reduce the physiological burden of surgery thus improving outcomes. FTS aims to use evidence-based practice to reduce complications, improve post-operative quality of life and decrease hospital length of stay. ⋯ Despite the evidence that recovery after colorectal surgery can be enhanced by using these approaches, implementation of FTS protocols has been slow. Acceptance of FTS protocols by all members of the multi-disciplinary team and a change in organisational structure to accommodate structured peri-operative care, are imperative to implementation.
-
Surg J R Coll Surg E · Apr 2011
Are we following the guiding SIGN when managing paediatric head injury?
The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) has published guidelines for the management of children with head injuries. The management of children with head injuries admitted to our local unit under the Paediatric Surgeons has been audited to determine whether or not current practice follows SIGN recommendations. ⋯ Our study has identified that management of paediatric head injuries in our unit is reliant on clinical acumen rather than the SIGN guidelines when making decisions regarding the need for imaging, neurosurgical review and follow-up. We suggest further investigation is required to determine whether greater awareness and closer adherence with the guidelines would alter clinical outcomes.