Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
-
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Nov 2019
[The relationship between acid reflux and esophageal motility, esophagitis and cardiac morphology in gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Objective: To analyze the relationship between the severity of esophageal acid reflux and esophageal motility, esophageal mucosal injury and morphological anatomy of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: The clinicaldata of GERD patients who underwent 24 h pH-impedance monitoring, gastroscopy and high-resolution manometry (HRM) from January 2016 to January 2019 in the Gastroesophageal Surgery Department of PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into non-pathological acid reflux group, mild pathological acid reflux group and moderate to severe pathological acid reflux group according to the DeMeester score. ⋯ Conclusions: The esophageal low motility (such as low LES pressure) and anatomical abnormalities (abdominal esophageal shortening, GEJ flabbiness, and even HH formation) of the GEJ regionare significantly associated with the severity of acid reflux. These factors may be important causes of increased acid reflux. In addition, the aggravation of acid reflux can also increase the incidence and severity of esophagitis.
-
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Nov 2019
Comparative Study[Dosimetric comparison of the helical tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer].
Objective: To compare the dosimetric parameters of three different modern radiation techniques in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 25 patients with pathologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital were included from September 2015 to May 2016 and three radiation treatment plans for helical tomotherapy (TOMO), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were designed respectively for each patient. Study patients included 24 males and 1 female,aged from 47 to 82 years old, with a median age of 63 years old. ⋯ TOMO (38.17±4.14) Gy was significantly superior to VMAT ((39.52±3.64)Gy,t=-2.219, P=0.040) and IMRT ((40.87±3.59)Gy,t=-4.528, P=0.000) at D(max) of the spinal cord. Conclusions: The VMAT plan is better than TOMO and IMRT in terms of the conformal degree and dose uniformity of the target volume. TOMO seems significantly better than VMAT and IMRT in protecting normal tissue.