Regional anesthesia
-
Regional anesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5% articaine, 0.5% lidocaine, or 0.5% prilocaine. A double-blind randomized clinical study.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three local anesthetic agents for intravenous regional anesthesia in the upper limb. Side effects and plasma concentrations of the drugs in the doses administered for IVRA were also studied. ⋯ Articaine had the fastest onset of sensory block and the lowest peak plasma concentration of the three local anesthetics when used for intravenous regional anesthesia.
-
Regional anesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTransdermal fentanyl in postoperative pain.
The aim of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of a transdermal fentanyl delivery system for the relief of pain following abdominal surgery. ⋯ Similar postoperative analgesia was achieved with less parenteral analgesics in patients who received transdermal fentanyl preoperatively than in control patients. Fentanyl, 50-75 micrograms/h, administered in a transdermal delivery system, did not depress respiratory rate or hemoglobin oxygen saturation. Although the exact role of continuously administered opioids in managing acute postoperative pain has yet to be clearly defined, it is concluded that if properly used, this new transdermal device can be effective in providing a background of analgesia, which may assist in the management of acute postoperative pain as well as some chronic pain states.
-
Regional anesthesia · Jan 1997
ReviewIdentification of the epidural space: is loss of resistance to air a safe technique? A review of the complications related to the use of air.
The major determinant of successful epidural anesthesia is the localization of the epidural space. The manual loss of resistance technique is widely used by anesthesiologists in identifying the epidural space. Should air or saline be used in detecting the point of loss of resistance? No consensus exists as to which technique is superior, and individual providers currently use the technique with which they are most comfortable. The incidence of adverse effects associated with the use of epidural air is unknown and may be underreported as the effects may be unrecognized or considered trivial. The authors comprehensively review the complications of epidural air from published reports. ⋯ The potential complications associated with the use of air for identifying the epidural space with the loss of resistance technique may outweigh the benefits. The use of saline to identify the epidural space may help to reduce the incidence of these complications.
-
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common condition often resulting in referral to a pain clinic. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, and various diagnostic tools are reviewed, and a variety of treatment methods are discussed. ⋯ The definitive pathogenesis of MPS is currently unknown, and no single diagnostic method is consistently positive. While trigger-point injection is the most widely employed method of treatment, other modes of therapy have also proved to be effective.
-
Regional anesthesia · Jan 1997
Clinical TrialExtended epidural catheter infusions with analgesics for patients with noncancer pain at their homes.
Patients with severe, noncancer pain unresponsive to epidural steroid injections are frequently referred for implantation of a permanent intraspinal device or for surgery. An alternative approach has been evaluated, which involves extended epidural catheter infusions of analgesics. ⋯ Temporary lumbar epidural catheter infusions represent an option between lumbar epidural steroid injections and more invasive and expensive modalities. The technique is effective in relieving chronic low back pain for extended periods, reducing its long-term intensity, and in some cases abolishing it.