Zentralblatt für Chirurgie
-
Comparative Study
[VATS lobectomy--a standard procedure in the therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer?].
Even though VATS lobectomy has been practised since 1991 in stage I of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it was not being considered equivalent to conventional lobectomy due to considerable doubts in terms of safety and oncological permissibility. This study describes our experience and an evaluation of the systematic establishment of lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) as standard treatment of NSCLC in stage I, which serves as an alternative to conventional surgery. For this purpose, 42 NSCLC patients in stage I, undergoing a conventional lobectomy in 2010 (group I), were retrospectively compared to 30 patients in the same tumour stage (group II) who were treated in 2011 using VATS lobectomy. ⋯ Therefore, VATS lobectomy constitutes an essential extension for the operative management in a lung cancer centre. Our results show that this new method is not only of equal, but of superior value compared to conventional lobectomy. Our experience and recent data in the literature illustrate that VATS lobectomy will play a decisive role in therapy for NSCLC in stage I, potentially even in stages II and IIIA.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Observational Study
[Surgical treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction - results achieved in multicentre studies].
Adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction are increasingly being considered as a separated tumour entity. The prognosis is rather poorer compared with that for distal gastric cancer. Data from a multicentre study as part of research on clinical care aim to reflect the current situation in surgical treatment after inauguration of neoadjuvant modalities. ⋯ The results in the treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction in the multicentre setting including surgical departments of each profile and region even after introduction of multimodal therapeutic concepts are not satisfying. In particular, modern diagnostic and surgical strategies need to be widely used or their percentage has to be increased. In this context, centralisation of the surgical care of this specific tumour entity appears reasonable.
-
Editorial Biography Historical Article
[Laudatio. Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h. c. Hans Lippert - professor for surgery at the Magdeburg Otto von Guericke University 1993-2013].
-
Iatrogenic colon perforation is a rare but life-threatening complication of colonscopy. As in other diseases, laparoscopic treatment has increasingly been propagated for the treatment of colonic disorders in the last years. The aim of this comparative study was to answer the question of whether laparoscopic surgical treatment may serve as a suitable treatment for the acute colon perforation comparable to open surgery. ⋯ An iatrogenic colon perforation mostly leeds to the immediate indication for a surgical treatment. The morbidity and mortality is -primarily determined through the appearance of postoperative complications due to delays in diagnostics and treatment. In this study the feasibility of a laparoscopic treatment could be shown. The laparoscopy with its minimal access trauma offers an enlargement of the diagnostics as well as a safe treatment of the perforation in most patients. However, the laparoscopic treatment especially in emergancy situations requires -advanced experience of the surgeon and always needs a critical benefit-risk consideration in the individual situation.
-
Thorax injuries are to be found in approximately 78 % amongst all victims of accidents. Moreover they implicate an increase in mortality rate. Consequently an adequate contemporary treatment has to begin preclinically, even if the conditions are less comfortable than in a clinical setting. Emergency doctors need to be familiar with the placement of chest tubes. ⋯ The study collective showed a significant preference to the lateral approach when placing a chest tube at the emergency scene of an accident. In total a prevalence of 19 % incorrect placements could be revealed, meaning the chest tube had either been placed within the lung parenchyma, the interlobe gap or extrathoracically. Concerning the patient outcome no statistically significant difference regarding the clinical course after incorrect chest tube placement could be identified. The omission of an indicated preclinical thoracic drainge is certainly a more serious error than its incorrect placement with more serious consequences.