Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed
-
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) · Aug 1994
Comparative StudyPulmonary edema and rapid transfusion: the comparison between rapid intravenous and intraarterial infusion in the severely hemorrhagic anesthesized pigs.
Patients with shock often develop pulmonary edema (PE) after rapid and massive fluid supplement and intravenous infusion. Rapid intraarterial infusion (RIA) is often used for fluid supplement in cardiac surgery, but has not yet been applied to treatment of hemorrhagic shock. However, by perfusing the ischemic peripheral organs through RIA, the fluid should flow first through the venous system to the heart and lung in less volume at lower speed. Therefore, the probability of developing PE should be less than that in rapid intravenous infusion (RIV) to the heart and lung in the same condition regarding volume and speed. Accordingly, we compared RIV and RIA in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock (HS) to determine if RIA provides any beneficial effect in reducing the development of PE. ⋯ RIA may be a better choice for fluid replacement in HS in terms of decreasing the development of PE and lessening the release of ETVI and TxB2 in severely hemorrhagic anesthetized pigs. Further human investigation is warranted.