The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Meta Analysis
Can tranexamic acid conserve blood and save operative time in spinal surgeries? A meta-analysis.
It is widely accepted that tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively reduces blood losses and transfusions in major surgeries. However, limited studies investigated the role of TXA in conserving blood and saving operative time in spine surgeries. ⋯ With the most comprehensive literature inclusion up to the present, this meta-analysis suggests that intravenous TXA use constitutes an important measure for conserving blood and saving operative time in spinal surgeries. High-dose TXA significantly reduces intraoperative-perioperative allogeneic transfusion rates and operative time, whereas low-dose TXA does not convey such efficacies. Larger prospective trials are still required to define the optimal regimen and to confirm the safety of TXA use in such surgeries.
-
Comparative Study
A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.
A variety of surgical methods are available for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis, but there is no consensus regarding their relative effects on clinical outcomes. ⋯ Available studies provide strong evidence that the addition of reduction to fusion does not result in better clinical outcomes of pain and function in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Evidence also suggests that there is no significant difference between interbody fusion (IF+PS) and posterior fusion (PLF±PS) in outcomes of pain, function, and complication rates at follow-up points up to approximately 3 years in cases of low-grade slips. However, studies with longer follow-up points suggest that interbody fusion (IF+PS) may perform better in these same measures at later follow-up points. Available evidence also suggests no difference between circumferential fusion (IF+PS+PLF) and interbody fusion (IF+PS) in outcomes of pain and function in low-grade slips, but circumferential fusion has been associated with greater intraoperative blood loss, longer surgery duration, and longer hospital stays. In terms of clinical outcomes, insufficient evidence is available to assess the utility of adding PS to PLF, the relative efficacy of different interbody fusion (IF+PS) techniques (ALIF+PS vs. TLIF+PS vs. PLIF+PS), and the relative efficacy of circumferential fusion and posterior fusion (PLF+PS).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial.
Surgery because of disc herniation or spinal stenosis results mostly in large improvement in the short-term, but mild to moderate improvements for pain and disability at long-term follow-up. Prehabilitation has been defined as augmenting functional capacity before surgery, which may have beneficial effect on outcome after surgery. ⋯ Presurgery physiotherapy decreases pain, risk of avoidance behavior, and worsening of psychological well-being, and improves quality of life and physical activity levels before surgery compared with waiting-list controls. These results were maintained only for activity levelspost surgery. Still, presurgery selection, content, dosage of exercises, and importance of being active in a presurgery physiotherapy intervention is of interest to study further to improve long-term outcome.
-
Comparative Study
Safety and accuracy of freehand versus navigated C2 pars or pedicle screw placement.
C2 pedicle and pars screws require accurate placement to avoid injury to nearby neurovascular structures. Freehand, fluoroscopically guided, and computed tomography (CT)-based navigation techniques have been described in the medical literature. ⋯ In patients with postoperative CT imaging (43%), the freehand technique was found to be more accurate than CT-based navigation for C2 pedicle or pars screw placement. Complication rates did not differ between the two techniques in this study.
-
Dysphagia has been recognized as one of the most serious complications after occipitocervical fusion (OCF), and the difference between postoperative and preoperative O-C2 angle (dO-C2A) was proposed to be an indicator in predicting and preventing dysphagia. Therefore, to prevent postoperative dysphagia, previous studies recommend that surgeons should correct the O-C2 angle (O-C2A) during surgery if the occipitocervical alignment was in an excessively flexed position. However, until now, there was no explicit indicator of the condition in which surgeons should adjust the patient's O-C2A during surgery. ⋯ The present study showed that the dO-C2A should be a key factor in the development of postoperative dysphagia after OCF. A dO-C2A of -5° could be the threshold between dysphagia and normal swallowing. Furthermore, to avoid dysphagia, surgeons should correct the O-C2A just before the final occipitocervical fixation if the checked dO-C2A during surgery is less than -5°.