-
- Nikolaos K Kanakaris, Christos Paliobeis, Nikolaos Nlanidakis, and Peter V Giannoudis.
- Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
- Injury. 2007 May 1;38 Suppl 2:S65-75.
AbstractThe mandatory stimulus that can optimise the healing pathway can be electrical, mechanical, biological, or a combination of all these parameters. A variety of means has been utilised for biological enhancement, including extracorporeal shock wave, electrical, ultrasound stimulation, the reaming technique of IM nailing, bone graft substitutes, osteogenic cells and bioactive molecules produced by tissue engineering techniques. The aim of this study is to present a review of the existing evidence for the efficacy of reaming, autologous bone grafting and the commercially available growth factors (BMP-2 and BMP-7) for the treatment of aseptic tibial non-unions. The gold standard method of enhancing bone healing in cases of tibial non-union remains the autologous bone graft. Autogenous bone grafts possess osteoconductive, osteoinductive properties and also osteoprogenitor cells. However, their harvesting is associated with high morbidity and many complications reaching percentages of 30%. Intramedullary reamed nailing, either used as an alternative fixation method or as an exchange to a wider implant, offers the unique biomechanical advantages of an intramedullary device, together with the osteoinductive stimulus of the by-products of reaming, and the aptitude for early weight-bearing and active rehabilitation. The safety of administration of the commercial distributed growth factors (BMP-2 and BMP-7), combined with the lack of the morbidity and the quantity restrictions that characterise autologous bone grafts, have given to this family of molecules a principal role between the other bone graft substitutes. On average the union rates reported in the 20 manuscripts that have been evaluated range from 58.3% to 100%, and the average time to union from 12.5 weeks to 48.4 weeks, indicating the significant discrepancies in the reported evidence and the multiplicity of different treatment strategies.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.