-
Multicenter Study
Cognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of the phenotype of frailty for adverse health outcomes: the three-city study.
- José Alberto Avila-Funes, Hélène Amieva, Pascale Barberger-Gateau, Mélanie Le Goff, Nadine Raoux, Karen Ritchie, Isabelle Carrière, Béatrice Tavernier, Christophe Tzourio, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo, and Jean-François Dartigues.
- Centre de Recherche Inserm, U897, Bordeaux, France.
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar 1;57(3):453-61.
ObjectivesTo determine whether adding cognitive impairment to frailty improves its predictive validity for adverse health outcomes.DesignFour-year longitudinal study.SettingThe French Three-City Study.ParticipantsSix thousand thirty community-dwelling persons aged 65 to 95.MeasurementsFrailty was defined as having at least three of the following criteria: weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, slowness, and low physical activity. Subjects meeting one or two criteria were prefrail and those meeting none as nonfrail. The lowest quartile in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Isaacs Set Test (IST) was used to identify subjects with cognitive impairment. The predictive validity of frailty for incident disability, hospitalization, dementia, and death was calculated first for frailty subgroups and then rerun after stratification according to the presence or absence of cognitive impairment.ResultsFour hundred twenty-one individuals (7%) met frailty criteria. Cognitive impairment was present in 10%, 12%, and 22% of the nonfrail, prefrail, and frail subjects, respectively. Those classified as frail scored lower on the MMSE and IST than those classified as prefrail and nonfrail. After adjustment, frail persons with cognitive impairment were significantly more likely to develop disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs over the following 4 years. The risk of incident mobility disability and hospitalization was marginally greater. Incident dementia was greater in the groups with cognitive impairment irrespective of their frailty status. Conversely, frailty was not a significant predictor of mortality.ConclusionCognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of the operational definition of frailty, because it increases the risk of adverse health outcomes in this particular subgroup of the elderly population.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.