• Medical education · Feb 2009

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial.

    • Peter Weyrich, Nora Celebi, Markus Schrauth, Andreas Möltner, Maria Lammerding-Köppel, and Christoph Nikendei.
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Angiology, Nephrology and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
    • Med Educ. 2009 Feb 1;43(2):113-20.

    ObjectivesAlthough peer-assisted learning (PAL) is widely employed throughout medical education, its effectiveness for training in technical procedures in skills laboratories has been subject to little systematic investigation. We conducted a prospective, randomised trial to evaluate the hypotheses that PAL is effective in technical skills training in a skills laboratory setting, and PAL is as effective as faculty staff-led training.MethodsVolunteer Year 3 medical students were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Two of these received regular skills training from either cross-year peer tutors or experienced faculty staff. Following training, both groups were assessed using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (three stations assessing various injection techniques) which was video-recorded. Two independent video assessors scored the OSCEs using binary checklists and global ranking forms. A third student group was assessed prior to training and served as a control group.ResultsA total of 89 students (mean age 23.0 +/- 0.2 years; 41 male, 48 female) agreed to participate in the trial. Confounding variables including prior training as a paramedic or previous experience in performing the technical procedures did not significantly differ between the three study groups. In the OSCE, PAL (58.1 +/- 1 binary points, 4.9 +/- 0.1 global ranking points) and faculty-led groups (58.3 +/- 1 binary points, 4.7 +/- 0.1 global ranking points) scored significantly higher than the control group (33.3 +/- 1 binary points, 2.7 +/- 0.1 global ranking points; all P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the PAL and faculty-led groups (P = 0.92 for binary checklists, P = 0.11 for global rankings).ConclusionsPeer-assisted learning is a successful method for learning technical procedures in a skills laboratory setting and can be just as effective as the training provided by experienced faculty staff.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.