• Kazuyuki Niki, Yoshiaki Okamoto, Yuka Matano, Ryouhei Ishii, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Tatsuya Takagi, and Etsuko Uejima.
• 1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy Research and Education, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University Graduate, Osaka, Japan.
• J Palliat Med. 2019 Jun 1; 22 (6): 685-690.

Abstract Background: There is no established method to objectively predict short-term prognosis. Recently, we proposed objective, short-term, prognostic predictive methods that are combinations of laboratory test items: WPCBAL score, derived from six values (white blood cell, platelet, C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase). However, that study was conducted in an acute-phase hospital to identify the test items useful for prognostic prediction; thus, whether WPCBAL score could be applied to terminal cancer patients in a palliative care unit was unverified. Objective: To verify the usefulness of WPCBAL score for terminal cancer patients. Design: A retrospective study. Setting/Subjects: Patients admitted to the palliative care unit of Ashiya Municipal Hospital (N = 128) in Japan in 2016. Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were compared between WPCBAL score and the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). Results: For predicting three-week prognosis, WPCBAL score showed higher AUROC compared with GPS (0.7540 and 0.6573, respectively). WPCBAL score predicting two-week prognosis showed greater AUROC than GPS predicting three-week prognosis (0.7491 and 0.6573, respectively). Conclusion: WPCBAL score was verified to objectively predict the two- or three-week prognosis for terminal cancer patients in a palliative care unit. WPCBAL score may be a new option for prognostic prediction for terminal cancer patients.

23 keywords...

hide…