Expert review of vaccines
-
Expert review of vaccines · Aug 2020
Safety profile of Infanrix hexa - 17 years of GSK's passive post-marketing surveillance.
This paper reports 17 years of passive safety surveillance of routine use of the pediatric hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type b-conjugate vaccine (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, Infanrix hexa, GSK). ⋯ What is the context? The cornerstone of childhood vaccination in many countries worldwide is a vaccine that protects against several diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b infections (such as meningitis). One of these vaccines (the longest on the market) is called Infanrix hexa; it has been available for infants and toddlers since 2000. After a vaccine is included in a country's routine vaccination program, its safety is constantly checked; this is done in clinical trials and through spontaneous reporting of adverse events after vaccination. It is important to share up-to-date information on the safety of vaccines, particularly since concerns about vaccine safety in parents may lead to lower vaccination rates an disease outbreaks. Here we summarize 17 years of safety data for the Infanrix hexa vaccine. What is new? We analyzed spontaneously reported adverse events after Infanrix hexa vaccinations between 2000 and 2017 The most commonly reported adverse events were fever, crying and injection site redness and swelling An in-depth review of extensive limb swelling after Infanrix hexa vaccination revealed no safety concerns. There was no increased risk of sudden death after Infanrix hexa vaccination, consistent with what was shown in several other studies. As shown previously, seizures were more common when Infanrix hexa was given together with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Prevnar 13, than when it was given alone. What is the take-home message? The large amount of safety data gathered from clinical trials and from spontaneous adverse event reporting during 17 years of routine vaccination with Infanrix hexa supports its continued use in young children.
-
Expert review of vaccines · Aug 2020
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and disease enhancement - knowns and unknowns.
The world is currently fighting a COVID-19 pandemic, perhaps the most disruptive infectious disease outbreak since the 1918 Spanish influenza. Governments have taken drastic measures to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and the development of safe and efficacious vaccine candidates is being accelerated. The possibility of vaccine-mediated disease enhancement with coronavirus vaccines has been flagged as a potential safety concern, and, despite the urgent need, should be thoroughly assessed as vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are being tested. ⋯ We compile and propose avenues to investigate the risk of vaccine-mediated disease enhancement both during pre-clinical and early clinical development. While the pressing need for a vaccine against COVID-19 (and future epidemic coronaviruses) cannot be ignored, we advocate to keep safety at the center of the debate. Protecting individuals with effective and safe vaccines should be a priority, even during extraordinary times like the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
Expert review of vaccines · Jul 2020
ReviewCombating the great mimicker: latest progress in the development of Burkholderia pseudomallei vaccines.
Introduction Burkholderia pseudomallei is an environmental intracellular Gram-negative bacterium that causes melioidosis, a severe infectious disease affecting humans and animals. An increase in melioidosis cases worldwide and the high mortality rate of the disease makes it a public health concern. Melioidosis is known as the 'great mimicker' because it presents with a wide range of disease manifestations. ⋯ Those candidates include live-attenuated vaccines, glycoconjugate vaccines, outer-membrane vesicles, and gold nanoparticle vaccines. Expert opinion Side-by-side comparison of the leading B. pseudomallei vaccine candidates will provide important information to further advance studies into pre-clinical trials. The likelihood of any of these current vaccines becoming the selected candidate that will reduce the occurrence of melioidosis worldwide is closer than ever.
-
Expert review of vaccines · Nov 2019
Moderate influenza vaccine effectiveness against A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, and low effectiveness against A(H3N2) subtype, 2018/19 season in Italy.
Background: Influenza vaccines are updated every year to match the vaccine strains with currently circulating viruses; consequently influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) has to be assessed annually. Research design and methods: A test-negative case-control study was conducted within the context of the Italian sentinel influenza surveillance network to estimate IVE by age group, virus subtype, and vaccine brand in medically attended laboratory-confirmed influenza. Results: In Italy, the 2018/19 influenza season was characterized by the co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses. ⋯ IVE against A(H1N1)pdm09 decreased with age ranging from 65.7% to 13.1% among children/adolescents and elderly, respectively; moreover results suggest that Vaxigrip Tetra® was more effective against A(H1N1)pdm09 compared to Fluarix Tetra® [62.5% (95% CI: 34.3 to 78.6) vs 24.5% (95% CI: -40.6 to 59.6)]. Low effectiveness (35.2%, 95% CI: -50.8 to 72.1) against A(H3N2) was detected only in the elderly immunized with Fluad®. Conclusions: Findings suggest that influenza vaccines were low to moderately effective, probably due to a mismatch between circulating and vaccine strains.
-
Expert review of vaccines · Oct 2019
Meta AnalysisThe impact of routine childhood immunization with higher-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on antimicrobial-resistant pneumococcal diseases and carriage: a systematic literature review.
Introduction: The introduction of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in childhood immunization programs reduced antimicrobial-resistant pneumococcal infections by vaccine serotypes. However, emerging antimicrobial-resistant non-vaccine serotypes, particularly serotype 19A, attenuated the overall effect. In 2010, higher-valent PCVs became available containing serotypes that are prone to become antimicrobial-resistant, like serotype 7F in PCV10 and PCV13, and serotype 19A in PCV13. ⋯ Only few studies have documented the impact of PCV10 on AMR. Multiple factors may influence observed decreases in pneumococcal AMR including antimicrobial stewardship, case definition, time since PCV10/13 introduction, and pre-PCV10/13 AMR levels. This review emphasizes the importance of including impact on AMR when evaluating the full public health of pneumococcal vaccination programs.