Neurocritical care
-
To investigate patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) for residual awareness, guidelines recommend quantifying glucose brain metabolism using positron emission tomography. However, this is not feasible in the intensive care unit (ICU). Cerebral blood flow (CBF) assessed by arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) could serve as a proxy for brain metabolism and reflect consciousness levels in acute DoC. We hypothesized that ASL-MRI would show compromised CBF in coma and unresponsive wakefulness states (UWS) but relatively preserved CBF in minimally conscious states (MCS) or better. ⋯ CBF measurement in ICU patients using ASL-MRI is feasible but cannot distinguish between the lower and the upper ends of the acute DoC spectrum. We suggest that pilot testing of diagnostic interventions at the extremes of this spectrum is a time-efficient approach in the continued quest to develop DoC neuroimaging markers in the ICU.
-
Social determinants of health (SDOH) have been linked to neurocritical care outcomes. We sought to examine the extent to which SDOH explain differences in decisions regarding life-sustaining therapy, a key outcome determinant. We specifically investigated the association of a patient's home geography, individual-level SDOH, and neighborhood-level SDOH with subsequent early limitation of life-sustaining therapy (eLLST) and early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (eWLST), adjusting for admission severity. ⋯ Across diagnoses, eLLST varied by home geography and was predicted by individual-level SDOH and neighborhood-level SDOH more so than by admission severity. Structured shared decision-making tools may therefore represent tools for health equity. Additionally, these findings provide a major warning: prognostic and artificial intelligence models seeking to predict outcomes such as mortality or emergence from disorders of consciousness may be encoded with self-fulfilling biases of geography and demographics.
-
The apnea test (AT) is an important component in the determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) and often entails disconnecting the patient from the ventilator followed by tracheal oxygen insufflation to ensure adequate oxygenation. To rate the test as positive, most international guidelines state that a lack of spontaneous breathing must be demonstrated when the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) ≥ 60 mm Hg. However, the loss of positive end-expiratory pressure that is associated with disconnection from the ventilator may cause rapid desaturation. This, in turn, can lead to cardiopulmonary instability (especially in patients with pulmonary impairment and diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome), putting patients at increased risk. Therefore, this prospective study aimed to investigate whether a modified version of the AT (mAT), in which the patient remains connected to the ventilator, is a safer yet still valid alternative. ⋯ The mAT is a safe and protective means of identifying patients who no longer have an intact central respiratory drive, which is a critical factor in the diagnosis of BD/DNC. Clinical trial registration DRKS, DRKS00017803, retrospectively registered 23.11.2020, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00017803.
-
Observational Study
Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting is Associated with Prolonged Hospital Stay in Critical Illness with Brain Injury.
Acute muscle wasting is common in critically ill patients, and this can lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with muscle wasting and to investigate the association between skeletal muscle wasting and prolonged hospital stay in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. ⋯ There was considerable muscle wasting in critically ill patients with brain injuries over a 1-week period. Acute muscle wasting was associated with prolonged hospital stay in critically ill patients with acute brain injury.
-
We have a reason to value the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA). Since enactment, the UDDA has been of paramount importance to US citizens, families of comatose patients, and the health care professionals who care for them. The UDDA sets forth two standards for determining death and leaves to the medical community to elaborate criteria by which physicians can determine when those standards have been met. ⋯ After several years of discussion without reaching a consensus, the committee's chair suspended the effort. Upending the UDDA will lead to a legal crisis and confusion across the states. We present our main arguments against revising this statute and argue that the committee's failure to revise the UDDA should actually be seen as a necessary success.