Journal of women's health
-
Journal of women's health · Aug 2022
Younger Age Impacts Perceptions of Care Received in the Emergency Department Among Women with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic etiology of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that primarily affects younger women with few traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate how younger age impacts the perception of care women receive in the emergency department (ED) at the time of their first or only SCAD. Methods: SCAD survivors were recruited using SCAD Alliance social media platforms to complete a one-time online survey regarding their experiences of seeking treatment for SCAD in the ED and their post-SCAD recovery. ⋯ Results: Fewer participants <50 years old than would be expected under the null hypothesis (i.e., 65.5% observed vs. 71.2% expected, p = 0.009) reported perceived serious treatment by ED staff, more participants <50 years than would be expected under the null hypothesis (i.e., 12.0% observed vs. 9.3% expected, p = 0.049) reported perceived dismissive treatment by ED staff, and more participants <50 years than would be expected under the null hypothesis (i.e., 13.3% observed vs. 10.8% expected, p = 0.02) reported discharge from the ED without a diagnosis. Conclusions: Results of this study highlight the different experiences of younger SCAD survivors' engaging with providers in the ED. Further research regarding strategies for increasing ED providers' clinical interrogation of SCAD when treating and evaluating younger female patients presenting with ACS symptoms is indicated.
-
Journal of women's health · Aug 2022
Menstrual Cycle Parameters Are Not Significantly Different After COVID-19 Vaccination.
Background: Some studies have suggested minor changes in the menstrual cycle after COVID-19 vaccination, but more detailed analyses of the menstrual cycle are needed to evaluate more specific changes in the menstrual cycle that are not affected by survey-based recall bias. Materials and Methods: Using a pretest-post-test quasi-experimental evaluation of menstrual cycle parameters before and after COVID-19 vaccination, we conducted an anonymous online survey of two groups of North American women who prospectively monitor their menstrual cycle parameters daily including bleeding patterns, urinary hormone levels using the ClearBlue Fertility Monitor, or cervical mucus observations. The primary outcome measures were cycle length, length of menses, menstrual volume, estimated day of ovulation (EDO), luteal phase length, and signs of ovulation. ⋯ Although 22% of women subjectively identified changes in their menstrual cycle, there were no significant differences in menstrual cycle parameters (cycle length, length of menses, EOD, and luteal phase length) between the pre-vaccine, vaccine, and post-vaccine cycles. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines were not associated with significant changes in menstrual cycle parameters. Perceived changes by an individual woman must be compared with statistical changes to avoid confirmation bias.